Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Leeann Chin is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Leeann Chin performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Leeann Chin performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Leeann Chin' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Leeann Chin' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance shows brand's share of foot traffic, revealing competitive strength and customer preference in the Cafe & Restaurants industry.
Leeann Chin, with a market performance percentile of 99, is a leading brand, placing it in the top 1%. This highlights strong market presence. Performance peers: U.S.Pizza, Asian Buffet, Aruba Beach Cafe, Sushi Factory, Sayulitas Mexican Food, Mizumi Buffet & Sushi.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects brand perception. Tracking overall and location-specific CSAT helps identify areas for improvement and growth opportunities.
Leeann Chin's overall CSAT is 54%, up 2.1pp year-over-year. Minnesota shows strong CSAT (59%, up 7.8pp), while Georgia's CSAT is lower (41%, down 1.9pp), suggesting regional differences in customer experience needing attention.
Average check reflects customer spending per visit. Monitoring overall and location-specific trends informs pricing and promotional strategies to optimize revenue.
Leeann Chin's overall average check is $17.50, down 1.4% year-over-year. Georgia shows $18.10, while Minnesota shows $17.30. The overall decrease suggests a need to evaluate pricing and value offerings.
Outlet count indicates brand reach. Tracking distribution by location helps assess market penetration and identify opportunities for expansion or consolidation.
Leeann Chin has 35 outlets in Minnesota, 2 in North Dakota, and 1 each in Georgia, Wisconsin, and Maryland. Minnesota is the primary market, while other states represent smaller segments of the brand's footprint.
Competitor analysis reveals brands that customers also frequent, informing competitive positioning and partnership opportunities to expand reach.
Leeann Chin's customers also visit McDonald's (18.05%), Dairy Queen (12.03%), Starbucks (7.52%), Caribou Coffee (7.52%), and Culver's (6.77%). This indicates overlap in customer preferences within the fast food and cafe sectors.
Understanding traffic workload by hour optimizes staffing and resource allocation, improving service efficiency during peak times and reducing costs during slow periods.
Leeann Chin's peak traffic workload occurs between 11 AM and 7 PM, with the highest volume at 12 PM. This data helps optimize staffing and resource allocation during these peak hours.
Analyzing consumer segments helps tailor marketing strategies to specific groups based on gender and generation, improving engagement and conversion rates.
Leeann Chin's consumer base shows an affinity index of 68 for Women and 127 for Men, indicating varying gender representation. Generations show: Gen X (80), Gen Y (122), and Gen Z (61). The data reveals preferences, not absolute user counts.