Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
La Marsa is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence La Marsa performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence La Marsa performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of La Marsa' competitors in the United States
An analysis of La Marsa' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance reveals brand's competitive strength and customer preference, essential for strategic decisions.
La Marsa holds a leading position with a market performance percentile of 99, placing it in the top 1% of brands. This indicates strong customer preference relative to competitors like Boza Cafe & Creamery, Williams Chicken, Namaste Grill & Bar, Mel's Drive-In, SOMISOMI and Elys Breakfast Restaurant & Burgers all within the same percentile.
Customer satisfaction is crucial as it directly impacts loyalty, brand reputation, and ultimately, revenue generation.
La Marsa demonstrates strong customer satisfaction with an overall CSAT of 89%, a 2.9 percentage point increase year-over-year. Michigan shows a significant CSAT increase of 7.9 percentage points, while Florida experienced a decrease of 11.5 percentage points. CSAT fluctuated slightly between approximately 87% and 89% from April to June 2025.
Average check reflects customer spending habits, informing pricing strategies and revenue optimization efforts.
La Marsa's overall average check is $28.60, showing a slight increase of 0.1% year-over-year. Florida exhibits a higher average check of $45.60 compared to Michigan's $26.40. The average check decreased from $30 in April 2025 to $23.98 in June 2025.
Outlet count indicates market reach and brand presence, influencing customer accessibility and growth potential.
La Marsa has a stronger presence in Michigan with 15 outlets, compared to Florida with only 1 outlet. This difference in outlet distribution impacts brand visibility and customer access in each state.
Identifying top competitors by customer cross-visitation informs competitive strategies and market positioning.
La Marsa's customers also frequently visit McDonald's (6.70%), Starbucks (4.91%), Taco Bell (4.46%), Leo's Coney Island (4.02%), and Dunkin' (3.13%). These brands represent La Marsa's key competitors in the cafe and restaurant industry.
Understanding traffic workload by hour helps optimize staffing and resource allocation for peak efficiency.
La Marsa experiences peak traffic workload between 5 PM and 6 PM (63.68% and 65.78%, respectively). Traffic gradually increases from 10 AM, reaching its highest point in the late afternoon/early evening before declining after 8 PM. Traffic is minimal from midnight to 9 AM.
Analyzing consumer demographics informs targeted marketing, product development, and enhanced customer engagement.
La Marsa's customer base shows a slightly higher affinity towards women (96 index) and men (103 index). Gen Y shows a higher affinity (105 index), while Gen Z is under-indexed (59 index) compared to Gen X (96 index).