Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Hamburger Stand is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Hamburger Stand performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Hamburger Stand performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Hamburger Stand' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Hamburger Stand' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market Performance shows brand’s share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Hamburger Stand's Market Performance is at the 99th percentile, which means it is a leading brand. This position indicates a strong market presence. Its performance peers, also at the 99th percentile, include Toot's, Mexican Mariachi Grill, Snappy Tomato Pizza, Domain, Boudro's on the Riverwalk, and Picazzo's Healthy Italian Kitchen.
Customer Satisfaction (CSAT) is key, reflecting brand perception and loyalty, which directly impacts revenue and long-term sustainability.
Overall CSAT for Hamburger Stand is 70%, a decrease of 3 percentage points year-over-year. Wyoming shows the highest CSAT at 76%, but a significant decrease of 12.8pp. Colorado has 71% with slight decrease. Arizona shows growth at 64%, with a 6.7pp increase. The trend shows CSAT decreasing over the observed months.
Average Check reveals customer spending habits, reflecting menu pricing effectiveness and customer purchasing power within the Cafe & Restaurants sector.
The overall Average Check for Hamburger Stand is $12.90, an increase of 12.3% year-over-year. Wyoming has the highest average check at $17.20. Colorado has the lowest average check at $10.90. Average check fluctuates significantly, peaking in June.
Tracking outlet count indicates brand expansion and market penetration, essential for assessing growth and geographic footprint.
Hamburger Stand has the most outlets in Colorado (6), followed by Arizona (4), California (2), and Wyoming (1). This distribution highlights key markets for the brand.
Identifying top competitors helps refine competitive strategies, understand market dynamics, and pinpoint opportunities for differentiation.
Hamburger Stand's top competitors based on customer cross-visitation are McDonald's (25.17%), Taco Bell (9.79%), Burger King (9.09%), Subway (9.09%), and Chick-fil-A (8.39%). McDonald's has a significantly higher cross-visitation rate.
Analyzing traffic workload reveals peak hours, allowing for efficient staffing and resource allocation to optimize customer service.
Peak traffic for Hamburger Stand occurs between 12:00 PM and 2:00 PM, with the highest workload at 1:00 PM (74.91%). Traffic is lowest in the early morning hours.
Understanding consumer segments informs targeted marketing, allowing customized messaging to resonate with specific demographics, maximizing engagement.
Hamburger Stand's customer base is comprised predominantly of women (affinity index 78) and Gen X (affinity index 181), indicating these segments are highly represented. Men are over average represented (affinity index 119). Gen Y has affinity index 81 and Gen Z 26, meaning they are underrepresented.