Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Goodcents is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Goodcents performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Goodcents performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Goodcents' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Goodcents' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market Performance percentile shows a brand’s share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference.
Goodcents' MARKET PERFORMANCE is at the 99th percentile, indicating a leading market position. This places Goodcents in the top 1% of brands, indicating strong customer preference. Peers in the same percentile are Bao Bao Cafe, Sicilian Oven, Red Fort Cuisine Of India, Uno Mas Tex Mex, Good Times Burgers & Frozen Custard, and The Salt Lick.
CSAT measures how well a company’s products or services meet customer expectations, critical for loyalty and repurchase rates.
Goodcents' overall customer satisfaction (CSAT) is 72%, a decrease of 4.8 percentage points year-over-year. Oklahoma shows the highest CSAT at 94% with 25.2 percentage points increase, while Nebraska and Missouri shows 65% with a decrease -15.3 and -12.1 percentage points respectively. This suggests regional variations in customer experience needing targeted improvements.
Average check is the average amount customers spend per visit, reflecting pricing strategy and customer spending habits.
Goodcents' overall average check is $15.30, a decrease of 13% year-over-year. Kansas has the highest average check at $16.50, while Arizona has the lowest at $10.50. The drop in average check suggests a need to examine pricing strategies or potential shifts in customer order patterns.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and market penetration, essential for understanding geographic influence.
Goodcents has 66 outlets across the United States. Kansas has the highest number of outlets at 27, followed by Missouri with 21. This distribution highlights key markets and potential areas for expansion or consolidation.
Identifying competitors by cross-visitation reveals brands vying for the same customer base, crucial for strategic positioning.
The top competitors for Goodcents, based on customer cross-visitation, are McDonald's (13.52%), Sonic Drive-In (8.90%), Taco Bell (7.83%), Burger King (6.76%), and Chipotle Mexican Grill (6.41%). This shows Goodcents shares customers primarily with fast-food chains.
Traffic workload by hour of day reveals peak times, helping optimize staffing and resource allocation for efficient operations.
Goodcents experiences peak traffic workload between 10:00 AM and 6:00 PM, with the highest traffic workload at 12:00 PM (72.48%). The lowest traffic workload occurs between 1:00 AM and 5:00 AM. This data can inform staffing and promotional strategies.
Consumer segment analysis by gender and generation informs targeted marketing and positioning strategies, crucial for brand affinity.
Goodcents' customer base shows a higher affinity index for women (96%) compared to men (103%). Among generations, Gen X exhibits a higher affinity (135%), while Gen Y (76%) and Gen Z (88%) are under-indexed. This suggests targeted marketing toward Gen X may be more effective.