Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Golden Krust Caribbean Restaurant is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Golden Krust Caribbean Restaurant performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Golden Krust Caribbean Restaurant performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Golden Krust Caribbean Restaurant' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Golden Krust Caribbean Restaurant' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance shows brand’s share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Golden Krust Caribbean Restaurant holds a leading market performance at the 99th percentile. This indicates a strong competitive position, signifying that the brand captures a substantial share relative to its peers like Filiberto's Mexican Food.
CSAT is crucial for understanding customer loyalty and identifying areas for service improvement to enhance brand perception.
Golden Krust Caribbean Restaurant shows a customer satisfaction of 72%, a significant 8.9 percentage point increase year-over-year. The highest CSAT is in Texas (79%), while New York shows the largest growth (24.3pp).
Average check reveals customer spending habits, vital for pricing strategies and revenue forecasting to optimize profitability.
The overall average check for Golden Krust Caribbean Restaurant is $27 USD, a 1.6% increase year-over-year. New Jersey leads with the highest average check ($35.5 USD). The dynamic data indicates fluctuations in average check values over the observed months.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and expansion strategy, reflecting market penetration and accessibility to consumers.
Golden Krust Caribbean Restaurant has the most outlets in New York (49), followed by Florida (26) and Georgia (18). This distribution reflects the brand's established presence in these states, suggesting a targeted expansion strategy.
Competitor analysis identifies key players and customer preferences, enabling strategic positioning and differentiation efforts.
McDonald's (13.91%) is the most cross-visited brand by Golden Krust Caribbean Restaurant customers, followed by Dunkin' (8.61%) and Wendy's (7.12%). This highlights the competitive landscape and shared customer base within the fast-food sector.
Traffic workload insights inform staffing and resource allocation, optimizing operational efficiency and customer experience.
Golden Krust Caribbean Restaurant experiences peak traffic workload between 11 AM and 3 PM, with the highest activity at 1 PM (65.32). This data allows for optimized staffing during peak hours and strategic marketing efforts during slower periods.
Understanding consumer segments tailors marketing efforts and product offerings, maximizing engagement and brand relevance.
Women are overrepresented among Golden Krust Caribbean Restaurant consumers (affinity index 110), while men are slightly underrepresented (91). Gen X (107) and Gen Y (106) show higher affinity, while Gen Z (64) is significantly underrepresented.