Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Crimson Coward is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Crimson Coward performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Crimson Coward performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Crimson Coward' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Crimson Coward' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance percentile reveals brand’s share of foot traffic, competitive strength, and customer preference in the industry.
Crimson Coward holds a leading market position with a percentile of 99, placing it in the top 1% of brands. This indicates a strong competitive advantage and high customer preference compared to peers like 32 North, Tia Juanita's Fish Camp, Southerns, Da Silva Steakhouse, MOKAFÉ, and El Patio Restaurant, who all share a similar leading position.
CSAT reflects customer happiness, impacting loyalty and brand reputation. Monitoring trends helps identify areas for improvement to boost satisfaction.
Crimson Coward shows strong customer satisfaction, with an overall CSAT of 91%, a 13.6 percentage point increase year-over-year. California leads with 98%, followed by Virginia (90%), Maryland (89%), and Texas (87%). Michigan's 69% suggests room for improvement in customer satisfaction within that state.
Average check reveals customer spending habits, influencing revenue projections and menu optimization strategies for increased profitability.
Crimson Coward's average check is $22.1, a 7.5% increase year-over-year, indicating customers are spending more per visit. California has the highest average check at $24.6 USD. Virginia, at $18.5 USD, has the lowest.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and market presence. Expansion strategies rely on understanding outlet distribution across different locations.
Crimson Coward operates multiple outlets in the United States. Virginia and Maryland lead with 5 outlets each, followed by California with 4. Texas, Michigan and Washington each have 1 outlet. This distribution highlights key markets for the brand.
Identifying competitors highlights market rivalry. This helps refine competitive strategies, positioning, and differentiation efforts for market share.
Crimson Coward's top competitors based on cross-visitation are McDonald's (9.03%), Chick-fil-A (4.52%), Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers (3.87%), Wendy's (3.87%), and IHOP (3.23%). This reveals the fast-food and family-dining landscape where Crimson Coward competes for customers.
Traffic workload patterns inform staffing, promotions, and operational efficiency, ensuring resources align with peak demand for optimal service.
Crimson Coward experiences peak traffic workload between 11 AM and 8 PM, with the highest workload at 1 PM (58.83%). Traffic is minimal from midnight to 10 AM, highlighting the need for adjusted staffing and operational strategies to match customer demand throughout the day.
Consumer segments reveal key demographics. Affinity insights inform targeted marketing and positioning strategies, increasing engagement and ROI.
Crimson Coward's consumer base shows an overrepresentation of Men (122 index) compared to Women (75 index). Among generations, Gen Y (113 index) and Gen Z (114 index) are overrepresented, while Gen X (89 index) is underrepresented, showing that the brand resonates more with younger demographics.