Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
CoCo Fresh Tea & Juice is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence CoCo Fresh Tea & Juice performance in the Taiwan and how they change over time
See what factors influence CoCo Fresh Tea & Juice performance in the Taiwan and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of CoCo Fresh Tea & Juice' competitors in the Taiwan
An analysis of CoCo Fresh Tea & Juice' competitors in the Taiwan
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance percentile shows a brand’s share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference.
CoCo Fresh Tea & Juice, with a market performance of 99, is a leading brand. This top 1% position indicates strong customer preference and a significant competitive advantage within the Cafe & Restaurants industry in Taiwan. Performance peers within the same percentile range include: 灰鴿/鍋(南屯店), Blue Balloon Cafe, 燒肉hot, Jhu Jian Hot Pot- Nankang Zhongzheng branch, 炸雞大獅, and 藝鍋物-桃園南崁店.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) indicates brand perception and loyalty, crucial for retention and positive word-of-mouth, impacting long-term growth.
CoCo Fresh Tea & Juice has an overall CSAT of 63%, up 1.9pp year-over-year. Kaohsiung shows the highest CSAT at 87%, with a growth of 17.5pp. Tainan follows with 76% and a significant growth of 31.4pp. Taichung experienced a decrease in CSAT, down by -24.9pp to 55%, indicating a potential area of concern.
Outlet count indicates market reach and expansion, reflecting brand accessibility and growth strategy effectiveness.
CoCo Fresh Tea & Juice has the highest number of outlets in Taoyuan City (20), followed by New Taipei (16). Other cities with outlets include Taichung (4), Taipei (3), Kaohsiung (2), Luodong (1), Tainan (1), Hsinchu (1) and Zhunan Town (1). The distribution indicates stronger presence in Taoyuan City and New Taipei.
Identifying key competitors reveals market dynamics and helps refine strategies to gain a competitive edge and attract customers.
The top competitors for CoCo Fresh Tea & Juice, based on cross-visitation, are McDonald's (10.63%), Starbucks (8.21%), MOS Burger (3.38%), KFC (3.38%), and 拉亞漢堡 (3.38%). These brands are frequently visited by CoCo Fresh Tea & Juice customers, indicating direct competition for market share.
Understanding traffic workload helps optimize staffing and resource allocation to meet demand and improve customer experience.
CoCo Fresh Tea & Juice experiences peak traffic workload between 10:00 and 21:00, with the highest workload at 18:00 (60.21%). Traffic is minimal between 0:00 and 8:00. These hours represents the time when customer visits are very intense.
Consumer segment analysis helps tailor marketing efforts to specific demographics, enhancing engagement and maximizing campaign effectiveness.
Women are slightly over-represented among CoCo Fresh Tea & Juice consumers (106 affinity index), while Men are slightly under-represented (94). Gen Z shows significantly high affinity (229), indicating strong engagement, while Gen Y is under-indexed (89), revealing a lower than average affinity.