Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
拉亞漢堡 is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence 拉亞漢堡 performance in the Taiwan and how they change over time
See what factors influence 拉亞漢堡 performance in the Taiwan and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of 拉亞漢堡' competitors in the Taiwan
An analysis of 拉亞漢堡' competitors in the Taiwan
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market Performance shows a brand’s share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the Cafe & Restaurants industry.
拉亞漢堡's Market Performance percentile is 99, which positions the brand as a leading performer. This indicates a strong market presence and high customer preference compared to peers like Kura Sushi, Moon Moon Food, 蟹老闆活海鮮-烏石港推薦海鮮餐廳|頭城道地海鮮|海鮮熱炒|活海鮮推薦|人氣生鮮|聚餐餐廳|合菜餐廳|海鮮餐廳推薦|在地推薦海鮮, 五鮮級鍋物專賣, 陶板屋, and KFC.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) is key, as it reflects customer loyalty and the likelihood of repeat business, driving long-term revenue and positive brand perception.
拉亞漢堡's overall customer satisfaction is at 69%, a 0.8 percentage point increase year-over-year. Pingtung City shows the highest CSAT at 89%, while Xinfeng Township experienced a decrease. This indicates generally positive customer experiences, with regional variations requiring attention.
Average check (Avg Check) indicates how much customers spend per visit. Monitoring this metric helps gauge pricing strategy effectiveness and customer spending habits.
The overall average check for 拉亞漢堡 is 145.6 TWD, a 2.1% increase year-over-year. Hsinchu has the highest average check at 207.7 TWD. This data shows increased customer spending, particularly in Hsinchu, highlighting potential regional pricing power.
Outlet count reflects brand reach and expansion. Tracking this KPI reveals geographic strength and market penetration within the Cafe & Restaurants industry.
拉亞漢堡 has the most outlets in Taichung (77) followed by New Taipei (71) and Taoyuan City (68). This illustrates strong brand presence in these cities and indicates regional market dominance in Taiwan.
Understanding competitors' cross-visitation helps refine marketing strategies. It identifies brands that share 拉亞漢堡's customer base, revealing direct competitive threats.
McDonald's (6.91%) has the highest cross-visitation with 拉亞漢堡 customers, followed by Starbucks (3.64%), Ba Fang Yun Ji (3.08%), Q Burger (2.65%), and MOS Burger (2.59%). These brands represent key competitors attracting similar customer segments.
Traffic workload by hour (HOD) reveals peak operational times. This data enables efficient staffing, optimized resource allocation, and minimized wait times for customers.
拉亞漢堡's peak traffic occurs between 8:00 and 10:00 AM, with 53.05% and 55.48% workload respectively. There is significant traffic starting 6:00 AM until 12:00 PM. This data suggests the need for higher staffing levels during these morning hours.
Analyzing consumer segments allows tailored marketing. Understanding the affinity index of various segments aids in targeted ads and specialized promotions for optimal ROI.
拉亞漢堡 has a high affinity index for women (106) and an under-indexed affinity for men (93) based on gender. For generation, the brand has a high affinity index for Gen Y (119) and Gen Z (153) demonstrating higher engagement.