Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Clean Juice is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Clean Juice performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Clean Juice performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Clean Juice' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Clean Juice' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market Performance shows brand's share of foot traffic, revealing competitive strength and customer preference in the Cafe & Restaurants industry.
Clean Juice holds a leading position with a market performance percentile of 99, indicating a high level of customer preference. Performance peers in the same range include Beau Jo's, Cugino Forno, Parriyas, China Garden, Dallas BBQ, and BRU Burger Bar.
Customer Satisfaction reveals brand's ability to meet customer expectations, impacting loyalty and positive word-of-mouth, and shows potential for growth.
Clean Juice shows strong customer satisfaction with an overall CSAT of 89%, a 12.9pp increase year-over-year. Georgia leads in CSAT at 98%, followed by Tennessee and Arizona at 95%. There's a recent downtrend in CSAT, decreasing from 93.70% in April to 77.19% in June 2025.
Average Check shows revenue per transaction, crucial for profitability and pricing strategy, helps optimize offerings to boost customer spending.
Clean Juice's average check is $17.30, a 10.9% decrease year-over-year. Tennessee has the highest average check at $23.10. The average check decreased from $18.54 in April to $17.72 in June 2025.
Number of Outlets shows brand's market presence, expansion strategy, and customer accessibility within the Cafe & Restaurants industry.
Clean Juice has 18 outlets in North Carolina, representing the largest concentration. Texas follows with 11 outlets. Other states include Florida and California (5 each), then Georgia, Illinois, and Arizona with 3. Tennessee and Pennsylvania has 2.
Competitor analysis reveals direct rivals and customer preferences, informing competitive strategies and identifying opportunities to differentiate.
Clean Juice's top competitors based on cross-visitation are Starbucks (6.54%), McDonald's (5.23%), Smoothie King (3.92%), Chick-fil-A (3.92%), and Dunkin' (2.61%). This indicates customer overlap with established brands.
Traffic Workload analysis reveals peak hours, enabling optimized staffing and resource allocation, boosting efficiency and customer satisfaction.
Clean Juice's peak traffic workload is between 9 AM and 5 PM, with the highest traffic around 12 PM (58.61). Traffic is minimal from 6 PM to 7 AM. Optimal staffing during midday can improve customer experience.
Consumer segmentation enables targeted marketing, optimized product offerings, and enhanced customer engagement, increasing brand relevance and loyalty.
Women (Affinity Index 130) are overrepresented among Clean Juice customers, while men (Affinity Index 74) are underrepresented. Gen Y (Affinity Index 125) and Gen X (Affinity Index 101) are overrepresented, while Gen Z (Affinity Index 58) is underrepresented.