Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Chuck E. Cheese is in the top 2% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Chuck E. Cheese performance in the Canada and how they change over time
See what factors influence Chuck E. Cheese performance in the Canada and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Chuck E. Cheese' competitors in the Canada
An analysis of Chuck E. Cheese' competitors in the Canada
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market Performance percentile shows brand’s share of foot traffic, revealing competitive strength and customer preference in the Cafe & Restaurants industry.
Chuck E. Cheese's Market Performance is at the 98th percentile, indicating a leading position. This means it outperforms most competitors in attracting customers. Performance peers in a similar range include Tommy Café, The Grand Mehfil, Shawarma Alley, RollyPollyCow, Pigeon Café, and Juice Dudez.
Customer Satisfaction (CSAT) reflects how happy customers are. Higher CSAT scores often link to better loyalty and positive word-of-mouth, influencing brand success.
Overall CSAT for Chuck E. Cheese in Canada is 74%, a 3.5 percentage point increase year-over-year. British Columbia leads with 87%, followed by Alberta at 84%. Ontario shows a decline at 67%. The trend from April to June 2025 shows an upward trajectory in CSAT.
Average Check reveals how much customers spend per visit. Tracking this helps understand spending habits and adjust pricing or offerings to boost revenue.
The overall average check for Chuck E. Cheese in Canada is CAD 40.7, a 12.4% decrease year-over-year. Ontario has the highest average check at CAD 46.5, while Alberta has the lowest at CAD 29.6. The trend from April to June 2025 shows fluctuations in average check.
Tracking outlet numbers shows expansion or contraction. More outlets can mean greater market reach, but managing them efficiently is key for success.
Chuck E. Cheese has a total of 10 outlets in Canada. Ontario has the most with 5 outlets, followed by Alberta with 3. British Columbia and Saskatchewan each have 1 outlet. This distribution indicates stronger presence in certain provinces.
Knowing competitors helps refine strategy. By pinpointing rivals favored by your customers, brands can adjust offerings and marketing to stay competitive.
The top competitors for Chuck E. Cheese, based on cross-visitation, are Tim Hortons (20.43%), McDonald's (15.32%), Dairy Queen (3.83%), Boston Pizza (3.83%), and Wendy's (3.83%). This indicates that customers who visit Chuck E. Cheese also frequent these fast-food and casual dining restaurants.
Understanding traffic workload by hour helps optimize staffing and resources. This ensures efficient operations and better customer service during peak times.
Peak traffic workload for Chuck E. Cheese occurs between 15:00 and 17:00 (3 PM to 5 PM), with the highest workload at 43.74%. Traffic starts increasing around 10:00 AM and decreases significantly after 8:00 PM. There is no traffic between 12:00 AM to 9:00 AM. This information can be used to optimize staffing during peak hours.
Understanding consumer segments helps to focus your marketing efforts. Knowing gender and generational mix allows targeted ad campaigns and better customer engagement.
Women are slightly overrepresented compared to men with an Affinity Index of 101 versus 100. Gen X is also overrepresented (101), while Gen Y (98) is slightly underrepresented, and Gen Z (67) is significantly underrepresented. This suggests a stronger affinity from Women and Gen X.