Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Broken Yolk Cafe is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Broken Yolk Cafe performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Broken Yolk Cafe performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Broken Yolk Cafe' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Broken Yolk Cafe' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market Performance percentile reflects brand's share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference.
Broken Yolk Cafe has a Market Performance of 99, indicating a leading position (top 1%). This signifies strong customer preference and a significant share in the Cafe & Restaurants industry. Performance peers include Bluestone Lane, Guadalajara's Grill, Dos Toros Taqueria, Country Kitchen, Aguardiente Colombian Steak House, and Mo'Bettahs Hawaiian Style Food, all within the same top percentile.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) measures how well a brand meets customer expectations, impacting loyalty and repeat business.
Broken Yolk Cafe's overall CSAT is 83%, up by 3.5 percentage points year-over-year. Arizona shows the highest CSAT at 91%, while Texas has the lowest at 63%. The trend shows a generally increasing CSAT from April to June 2025, indicating improved customer experiences.
Average check reflects customer spending per visit, influencing revenue and profitability.
The overall average check for Broken Yolk Cafe is $28.20, a slight increase of 0.3% year-over-year. California has the highest average check at $29.30, while Texas has the lowest at $26.00. The average check fluctuated slightly between April and June 2025, with no significant change.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and market presence, influencing accessibility and brand awareness.
Broken Yolk Cafe has 29 outlets in California, the most of any state. Arizona and Nevada each have 4 outlets, while Texas has 2, and Idaho has 1. The distribution of outlets reflects the brand's strategic focus on certain markets.
Identifying competitors reveals market dynamics and helps refine competitive strategies.
The top competitors for Broken Yolk Cafe, based on cross-visitation, are In-N-Out Burger (8.54%), Starbucks (6.35%), McDonald's (6.25%), Denny's (3.75%), and IHOP (3.02%). This suggests that Broken Yolk Cafe customers also frequent these brands.
Traffic workload highlights peak hours, enabling optimal staffing and resource allocation.
Traffic workload at Broken Yolk Cafe peaks between 9 AM and 12 PM, with the highest workload at 10 AM (59.47%). There is minimal traffic before 6 AM and after 2 PM. This indicates the busiest hours are mid-morning.
Understanding consumer segments allows for tailored marketing and improved customer engagement.
Women (96%) are slightly under-indexed while men (103%) are slightly over-indexed. Gen X (105%) is over-indexed, showing a higher affinity. Gen Y (99%) is almost at average affinity, while Gen Z (81%) is significantly under-indexed, suggesting a lower affinity.