Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
See what factors influence sweetgreen performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence sweetgreen performance in the United States and how they change over time
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
An analysis of sweetgreen' competitors in the United States
An analysis of sweetgreen' competitors in the United States
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jul – Sep 25
sweetgreen is right in the middle
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance percentile shows brand's share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
sweetgreen's MARKET PERFORMANCE is at the 55th percentile, indicating an average market position. This means sweetgreen performs comparably to Rancho Mateo Colombian Steakhouse, Fuzzy's Taco Shop, Landshark Bar & Grill, Just Salad, TooJay's Deli Bakery Restaurant, and Krispy Krunchy Chicken.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects how happy customers are with their experiences, impacting loyalty and brand reputation.
sweetgreen's overall CSAT is 68%, a 4.4 percentage point increase year-over-year. New Hampshire shows the highest CSAT at 84%, while Connecticut shows the largest growth at 27.4 percentage points. This indicates improved customer sentiment across most locations.
Average check reveals how much customers spend per visit, influencing revenue and profitability.
sweetgreen's overall average check is $19.90, a 0.9% decrease year-over-year. Ohio has the highest average check at $26.80. This suggests a slight decrease in customer spending compared to the previous year.
Number of outlets indicates brand reach and market presence, influencing accessibility and brand awareness.
sweetgreen has 49 outlets in California, the most of any state. New York follows with 45 outlets. This shows a strong presence in key markets like California and New York.
Competitor analysis identifies key rivals and customer cross-visitation, informing competitive strategies.
sweetgreen's top competitors based on customer cross-visitation are Starbucks (7.08%), McDonald's (5.63%), Chipotle Mexican Grill (4.75%), Chick-fil-A (3.49%), and CAVA (2.81%). This indicates that sweetgreen customers also frequent these establishments.
Traffic workload by hour reveals peak times, helping optimize staffing and resource allocation.
sweetgreen experiences peak traffic between 12:00 PM and 2:00 PM, with the highest workload at 64.13% at 12:00 PM. Traffic is minimal between midnight and 8:00 AM. This highlights the lunch rush as the busiest period.
Understanding consumer segments by gender and generation informs targeted marketing and positioning strategies.
Women are overrepresented among sweetgreen's consumers (affinity index 103), while men are slightly underrepresented (affinity index 97). Gen Y shows a high affinity (129), while Gen X is underrepresented (74). Gen Z is near average (99).