Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
See what factors influence Sushi Sushi performance in the Australia and how they change over time
See what factors influence Sushi Sushi performance in the Australia and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
An analysis of Sushi Sushi' competitors in the Australia
An analysis of Sushi Sushi' competitors in the Australia
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
Sushi Sushi is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance shows a brand’s share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Sushi Sushi, with a market performance of 99%, is a leading brand. This high percentile indicates a strong market position, reflecting customer preference and competitive advantage compared to peers such as The Wray Hotel, NOMAD, Frankie's Food Factory, Wild Bean Cafe, Cha Ching and Salt House.
Customer satisfaction reflects loyalty. A high score suggests strong brand affinity and repeat business, impacting long-term revenue and growth.
Sushi Sushi's overall customer satisfaction (CSAT) is 59%, a decrease of 12 percentage points year-over-year. CSAT varies by state: Queensland and Western Australia at 63%, while Victoria is at 58%. The trend shows a slight decline over the observed months, suggesting potential areas for service improvement.
Average check reveals spending per customer. Tracking it helps understand pricing strategy effectiveness and customer spending habits.
The overall average check for Sushi Sushi is 20.6 AUD, a 3.1% increase year-over-year. Victoria shows the highest average check at 21.9 AUD. The dynamic data shows fluctuations, with a peak in June 2025, indicating possible promotional impacts or seasonal trends.
Outlet count reflects brand reach. A larger number indicates wider availability and potentially higher market share.
Sushi Sushi has a total of 156 outlets across Australia. Victoria has the highest number of outlets (103), indicating a strong presence in that state, while other states like Western Australia, Queensland, and others have fewer locations, reflecting differing market penetration levels.
Competitor analysis identifies key players and overlapping customer bases, aiding in strategic positioning and targeted marketing efforts.
The top competitors for Sushi Sushi are McDonald's (8.66%), Subway (4.72%), Roll'd (3.94%), Hungry Jack's Burgers (3.15%), and KFC (3.15%). This cross-visitation data indicates that customers who visit Sushi Sushi also frequent these fast-food chains, suggesting similar consumer preferences or needs.
Understanding traffic workload by hour helps optimize staffing and resource allocation to meet customer demand effectively.
Traffic workload for Sushi Sushi varies throughout the day, peaking between 11 AM and 3 PM, with the highest traffic workload at noon (57.97). There is minimal activity during the early morning hours (0-3 AM). This data can inform staffing decisions and promotional activities.
Consumer segment analysis informs targeted marketing. Affinity insights enhance positioning strategies by understanding segment preferences.
Sushi Sushi's consumer base shows a higher affinity among women (Index 93) and Gen Y (Index 113). Women are under-indexed, while Gen Y is over-indexed, suggesting a strong resonance with younger consumers. This information is for segmentation strategy, but does not represent percentage of users.