Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
See what factors influence 人从众厚切牛排 performance in the Taiwan and how they change over time
See what factors influence 人从众厚切牛排 performance in the Taiwan and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
Search among the top brands by number of locations
An analysis of 人从众厚切牛排' competitors in the Taiwan
An analysis of 人从众厚切牛排' competitors in the Taiwan
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
人从众厚切牛排 is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance shows brand's share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
人从众厚切牛排's market performance is in the top 1%, indicating a leading position. This signifies strong customer preference and a competitive edge in Taiwan's Cafe & Restaurants industry. Performance peers in the same percentile range include Le Ble d'Or, 爭鮮迴轉壽司, 點22 港式點心專賣店, NU PASTA, 見山景觀咖啡餐廳-桃園景觀餐廳 龍潭美食 龍潭夜景咖啡 龍潭咖啡廳 龍潭景觀餐廳 龍潭景點 桃園網美夜景 龍潭網美夜景 龍潭約會 咖啡廳推薦 餐廳推薦 餐酒館, and 50 Lan.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects customers' happiness with a brand. High CSAT scores often correlate with increased loyalty and positive word-of-mouth.
人从众厚切牛排 has an overall CSAT of 87%, a 10pp increase year-over-year, indicating improved customer happiness. Taoyuan City shows the highest CSAT (94%), while New Taipei has the lowest (69%) with a decrease of 5.2pp, suggesting potential service issues. The CSAT dynamic data shows fluctuations between 85.56 and 87.85 from May to July 2025.
Average check (AvgCheck) indicates how much customers spend per visit. Monitoring AvgCheck trends helps optimize pricing and menu strategies.
人从众厚切牛排's overall average check is 354.70 TWD, a 2.6% decrease year-over-year. Kaohsiung has the highest average check (410.30 TWD). Taoyuan City has the lowest average check (341.90 TWD). The average check dynamic data fluctuates between 344.88 and 363.60 TWD from May to July 2025, indicating seasonal variations.
The number of outlets indicates brand's reach. An increasing number of outlets is a sign of expansion and growing market presence.
人从众厚切牛排 has a total of 18 outlets in Taiwan. Taipei has the most outlets (7), followed by New Taipei (6). Keelung and Kaohsiung each have 1 outlet. This distribution highlights the brand's stronger presence in the Taipei metropolitan area.
Analyzing competitors helps in understanding the market dynamics, identify opportunities, and develop strategies to gain a competitive advantage.
The top competitors for 人从众厚切牛排, based on cross-visitation, are McDonald's (4.59%), Starbucks (2.30%), Pizza Hut (2.17%), Tasty (2.17%), and Q Burger (1.66%). This suggests that customers who visit 人从众厚切牛排 also frequent fast-food and casual dining restaurants.
Traffic workload indicates the peak operational hours. Understanding workload patterns enables efficient staffing and resource allocation.
人从众厚切牛排 experiences peak traffic workload between 17:00 and 19:00, with the highest workload at 18:00 (66.58). Traffic is minimal between 0:00 and 10:00. This suggests that the restaurant is busiest during dinner hours.
Consumer segments by gender and generation inform targeted marketing and positioning strategies, tailoring products and messaging to specific groups.
人从众厚切牛排's consumer base is predominantly women (75%). Men over-indexed (126). Gen X are highly represented (121 index), while Gen Y slightly over-indexed (103 index) and Gen Z has lower affinity (64 index). These insights inform marketing efforts tailored to women and Gen X.