Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
See what factors influence Milk & Honey Southern Inspired Kitchen performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Milk & Honey Southern Inspired Kitchen performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
An analysis of Milk & Honey Southern Inspired Kitchen' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Milk & Honey Southern Inspired Kitchen' competitors in the United States
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
Milk & Honey Southern Inspired Kitchen is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance percentile reveals competitive strength and customer preference, indicating the brand's share of foot traffic in its industry.
Milk & Honey Southern Inspired Kitchen's market performance is in the top 1% (leading position). This shows a strong customer preference and market dominance. Performance peers include Ledo Pizza, Eataly, and Abelardo's Mexican Fresh (99th percentile).
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) gauges loyalty. Tracking it identifies strengths/weaknesses, guiding improvements & highlighting successful strategies.
Milk & Honey's overall CSAT is 80%, a 4.1 percentage point increase year-over-year, indicating improved customer perception. Maryland shows the highest CSAT (84%), while Virginia's CSAT decreased to 77%. CSAT fluctuates slightly over the measured months.
Average check reflects spending per customer, crucial for revenue insights. Monitoring trends informs pricing strategies and promotional effectiveness.
The overall average check is $42.60, up 8.2% year-over-year, showing increased customer spending. The District of Columbia has the highest average check ($46.30), while Georgia has the lowest ($35.80). The average check remains relatively stable across the reported months.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and expansion. Tracking this shows growth, market penetration, and potential revenue streams by location.
Milk & Honey has 8 outlets in Maryland, 4 in Virginia, 2 in the District of Columbia, and 1 in Georgia. Maryland is the strongest market. The number of outlets per state provides insight into market focus.
Competitor analysis identifies market rivals and customer overlaps. This helps refine strategies and understand competitive positioning and consumer choices.
McDonald's (8.17%) has the highest cross-visitation, followed by Chick-fil-A (4.78%), IHOP (3.54%), Starbucks (3.39%), and Silver Diner (3.08%). This shows customers of Milk & Honey also visit these popular chains.
Traffic workload uncovers peak hours, enabling efficient staffing and resource allocation. Understanding customer flow optimizes service and satisfaction.
Peak traffic is between 11 AM and 1 PM, with the highest workload at noon (66.30%). Traffic significantly decreases after 7 PM, indicating the need for optimized staffing levels throughout the day.
Segment analysis tailors marketing to specific demographics. Understanding gender/generational preferences optimizes engagement and messaging effectiveness.
Women (123 affinity index) are overrepresented. Men (78 affinity index) are underrepresented. Gen X (104 affinity index) and Gen Y (112 affinity index) are overrepresented, while Gen Z (86 affinity index) shows lower affinity.