Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
See what factors influence LIT Pizza performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence LIT Pizza performance in the United States and how they change over time
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
An analysis of LIT Pizza' competitors in the United States
An analysis of LIT Pizza' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jul – Sep 25
LIT Pizza is in the lower 25% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance percentile indicates brand's share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference.
LIT Pizza's market performance is in the lower 25%, indicating a lagging position. This means LIT Pizza captures less foot traffic compared to its competitors. Performance peers in the same range include Destination Downtown Food Hall, 83, Ottava Via, The Blend Coffee & Cocktails, Sweet Susie's Frozen Treats, and Riverwinds Restaurant.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects customer happiness, impacting loyalty, brand reputation, and revenue growth.
LIT Pizza's overall CSAT is 80%, a decrease of 6.3 percentage points year-over-year. In Louisiana, CSAT is also 80% with the same decrease. The CSAT trend shows fluctuations, with a high of 85.42% in June 2025 and a low of 74% in July 2025.
Average check reveals spending per customer, crucial for revenue insights and pricing strategy optimization.
LIT Pizza's overall average check is $15.50, a decrease of 9.4% year-over-year. In Louisiana, the average check is $15.50 with no growth. The average check trend shows fluctuations, with a low of $13.89 in June 2025 and a high of $17.27 in August 2025.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and market presence, influencing accessibility and growth potential.
LIT Pizza has 14 outlets in Louisiana. This indicates the brand's physical presence and distribution network within the state.
Competitor analysis identifies key rivals, informing strategies to gain market share and customer loyalty.
LIT Pizza's top competitors based on customer cross-visitation are Starbucks (8.47%), Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers (8.47%), McDonald's (8.47%), Taco Bell (6.78%), and Pizza Hut (6.78%). This indicates customers who visit LIT Pizza also frequent these establishments.
Traffic workload reveals peak hours, enabling efficient staffing and resource allocation for optimal service.
LIT Pizza experiences peak traffic workload between 11 AM and 8 PM, with the highest workload at 12 PM (64.70%) and 6 PM (63.35%). Traffic is minimal before 10 AM and after 9 PM.
Understanding consumer segments allows targeted marketing, tailoring products and messages to specific groups.
LIT Pizza's consumer base shows a higher affinity towards men (124%) compared to women (75%). Among generations, Gen X shows the highest affinity (125%), followed by Gen Z (102%) and Gen Y (86%).