Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
See what factors influence Life Alive Organic Cafe performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Life Alive Organic Cafe performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
Search among the top brands by number of locations
An analysis of Life Alive Organic Cafe' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Life Alive Organic Cafe' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
Life Alive Organic Cafe is in the top 2% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance shows brand's share of foot traffic, revealing competitive strength and customer preference in the Cafe & Restaurants industry.
Life Alive Organic Cafe's market performance is in the top 2% (98th percentile), indicating a leading position. This means the brand outperforms most competitors in attracting customers. Performance peers include Pier Patio Pub, El Trompo Loco, Atomic Kendall, Panadería España, Dienner's Country Restaurant, and Nuevo Tacos Al Suadero.
Customer satisfaction reflects customer loyalty and brand perception, impacting long-term growth and profitability in the competitive landscape.
Life Alive Organic Cafe's overall customer satisfaction (CSAT) is 79%, with a 4.1 percentage point decrease year-over-year. In Massachusetts, the CSAT is also 79% with the same decrease. The CSAT has fluctuated between 73.48% and 86.11% during the period, indicating some variability in customer experience.
Average check indicates spending per customer, influencing revenue. Monitoring changes informs pricing and promotional strategies effectiveness.
Life Alive Organic Cafe's overall average check is $17.60, a decrease of 11.9% year-over-year. In Massachusetts, the average check is also $17.60 with no growth. The average check has varied between $17.05 and $18.51 during the period.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and expansion, signaling growth potential and market presence to customers and investors.
Life Alive Organic Cafe has 12 outlets in the United States, all located in Massachusetts. This suggests a concentrated presence in a specific geographic area, but no indication of growth in number of outlets.
Competitor analysis identifies key rivals, revealing market dynamics and opportunities to differentiate offerings and attract more customers.
Life Alive Organic Cafe's top competitors based on cross-visitation are Tatte Bakery & Cafe (10.56%), McDonald's (6.83%), Dunkin' (6.21%), Starbucks (4.97%), and Chipotle Mexican Grill (4.35%). These brands represent alternative dining choices for Life Alive's customers.
Understanding traffic patterns helps optimize staffing, promotions, and resource allocation to meet customer demand effectively.
Life Alive Organic Cafe experiences peak traffic between 12 PM and 6 PM, with the highest workload around 1 PM (61.39%). Traffic is minimal between 10 PM and 7 AM, indicating core business hours and potential for off-peak promotions.
Understanding consumer segments allows for targeted marketing, personalized experiences, and optimized product offerings, maximizing customer engagement.
Life Alive Organic Cafe has a high affinity with Women (106 index, over-represented), and Men are slightly under-represented (95 index). Gen Y shows a high affinity (117 index, over-represented), while Gen X (87 index, under-represented) and Gen Z (82 index, under-represented) segments exhibit lower affinity compared to the average consumer.