Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
See what factors influence Killer Burger performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Killer Burger performance in the United States and how they change over time
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jul – Sep 25
Killer Burger is right in the middle
Sample of brands in the same percentile
An analysis of Killer Burger' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Killer Burger' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance shows brand's share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Killer Burger's market performance is at the 47th percentile, indicating a below average/lagging market position. This suggests the brand captures less foot traffic than the majority of its competitors. Performance peers in the same percentile range include Thai Street Cafe and Burgermeister.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects customer happiness, impacting loyalty and brand reputation, crucial for sustained growth.
Killer Burger's overall CSAT is 82%, a 1.2 percentage point increase year-over-year, indicating improved customer happiness. Washington and Idaho show the highest CSAT at 84%, while Oregon has a slightly lower CSAT of 82%.
Average check reveals spending per customer, crucial for revenue insights and pricing strategy optimization.
Killer Burger's overall average check is $18.30, a 5.1% increase year-over-year, suggesting customers are spending more per visit. Texas has the highest average check at $22.20, while Washington has the lowest at $17.60.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and market presence, directly impacting accessibility and revenue potential.
Killer Burger has 25 outlets across the United States. Oregon has the most outlets with 18, followed by Washington with 4, Texas with 2, and Idaho with 1, showing a strong presence in Oregon.
Competitor analysis identifies key rivals, informing strategies to gain market share and customer loyalty.
Killer Burger's top competitors based on cross-visitation are McDonald's (6.05%), Chick-fil-A (4.84%), Panda Express (4.60%), Taco Bell (4.36%), and Starbucks (4.12%). This indicates customers who visit Killer Burger also frequent these establishments.
Traffic workload reveals peak hours, enabling efficient staffing and resource allocation for optimal service.
Killer Burger experiences peak traffic between 12 PM and 6 PM, with the highest workload around 1 PM (73.50). Traffic is minimal before 10 AM and after 9 PM, indicating the need for adjusted staffing during off-peak hours.
Understanding consumer segments enables targeted marketing, enhancing engagement and brand resonance.
Killer Burger's consumer base shows a high affinity among women (index 79) and men (index 120). Gen X is overrepresented (index 125), while Gen Y is underrepresented (index 90), and Gen Z is slightly overrepresented (index 101).