Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
See what factors influence Kagetsu Arashi performance in the Taiwan and how they change over time
See what factors influence Kagetsu Arashi performance in the Taiwan and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
An analysis of Kagetsu Arashi' competitors in the Taiwan
An analysis of Kagetsu Arashi' competitors in the Taiwan
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
Kagetsu Arashi is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance reveals brand's share of foot traffic, reflecting competitive strength and customer preference.
Kagetsu Arashi, with a market performance percentile of 99 in Taiwan's Cafe & Restaurants industry, holds a leading position. This indicates a strong competitive advantage, suggesting high customer preference and market dominance compared to peers like 貍小籠點心專門店 LI XIAO LONG, Nongcui Curry & Puff, Ji Guang, 廢溫室Greenhouse café, 饗點鍋 彰化員林店, and 湯王胡椒豬肚雞南屏分店.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects customer loyalty and indicates the health of customer relationships, influencing repeat business.
Kagetsu Arashi's overall customer satisfaction in Taiwan is 48%, a slight decrease of 0.1 percentage points year-over-year. Satisfaction varies across cities, with New Taipei showing a high of 63% and growth of 10.9 percentage points, while Taipei scores a low of 36% with a decrease of -13.9 percentage points. Kaohsiung also experienced a significant decrease of -22.3 percentage points. This indicates a need to investigate and address factors affecting customer satisfaction in specific regions, particularly in Taipei and Kaohsiung.
Average check (Avg Check) reflects customer spending and influences revenue, showcasing the brand's pricing power.
Kagetsu Arashi's overall average check in Taiwan is 334.4 TWD, an increase of 7.9% year-over-year. Average check varies across cities, with Tainan showing a high of 568.8 TWD, while New Taipei is at 302.4 TWD. This may reflect differences in menu offerings, local pricing strategies, or customer demographics in each city.
Number of outlets (Outlets) indicates brand reach, influencing market share and accessibility for the target audience.
Kagetsu Arashi has a varying number of outlets across Taiwan. New Taipei leads with 6 outlets, followed by Taoyuan City and Taipei with 4 each. Taichung has 3, while Tainan and Kaohsiung both have 2. Pingtung City has 1 outlet. This distribution indicates a strategic focus on specific urban areas.
Competitor analysis reveals market rivals and their customer overlap, guiding strategic positioning.
The top competitors for Kagetsu Arashi, based on customer cross-visitation, are McDonald's (7.67%), Starbucks (4.53%), 店 (3.14%), Ba Fang Yun Ji (3.14%), and KFC (2.44%). This shows a significant overlap in customer base with major fast-food and cafe chains, which Kagetsu Arashi needs to consider in its strategy.
Traffic workload by hours (Activity) uncovers peak hours and operational needs, optimizing staffing and resource allocation.
Kagetsu Arashi's peak traffic workload occurs between 11:00 and 21:00, with the highest activity around 12:00-13:00 (61.95-63.26). There is almost no workload between 22:00 and 10:00. This information is critical for staffing and resource planning.
Consumer segmentation informs targeted strategies, aligning offerings with the unique needs of key customer groups.
Kagetsu Arashi's consumer base shows high affinity towards men (119%) and Gen X (182%), Gen Z (191%), while there is a weaker affinity for women (82%) and Gen Y (48%). This suggests the brand resonates more strongly with males, and Gen X and Gen Z generations than with females and Gen Y generation.