Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
See what factors influence JJ Fish and Chicken performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence JJ Fish and Chicken performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
An analysis of JJ Fish and Chicken' competitors in the United States
An analysis of JJ Fish and Chicken' competitors in the United States
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
JJ Fish and Chicken is in the top 2% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market Performance percentile indicates the brand’s share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference.
JJ Fish and Chicken holds a leading market position at the 98th percentile. This indicates the brand captures a significant share of customer traffic, surpassing many competitors. Performance peers within the 98th percentile include Pokekai, Fuzzy's Pizza Katy, Pasta Della Nonna, Levant BBQ, Clove Garden and NoorJahan Indian Cuisine - Northville.
Customer Satisfaction shows brand perception. Tracking CSAT helps understand customer loyalty, identify areas for improvement, and inform service enhancements.
JJ Fish and Chicken demonstrates a strong customer satisfaction with an overall CSAT score of 65%, showing a 12 percentage point increase year-over-year. CSAT is highest in California and Georgia. However, CSAT decreased in Indiana. The dynamic CSAT data shows fluctuations between May and July 2025.
Average Check reveals customer spending habits. It informs pricing strategies, menu optimization, and promotional effectiveness, directly impacting revenue.
The overall average check for JJ Fish and Chicken is $26.40, reflecting an 8.1% increase year-over-year. California has the highest average check ($33.00), while Indiana has the lowest ($16.70). Average check varied between May and July 2025, peaking in June.
Outlet number indicates market reach and expansion. Tracking outlet distribution helps assess market penetration and identify growth opportunities across regions.
JJ Fish and Chicken has a concentration of outlets in California (10). Indiana, Georgia and Illinois each have fewer outlets (3, 1 and 1 respectively). This distribution shows potential areas for expansion and resource allocation.
Competitor analysis highlights competitive landscape. Understanding cross-visitation patterns helps refine marketing strategies and identify differentiation opportunities.
McDonald's (18.71%) is the most frequently visited competitor by JJ Fish and Chicken customers, followed by Taco Bell and Wendy's (10.07%). Burger King and Chick-fil-A are also significant competitors (8.63%). This indicates shared customer base with major fast-food chains.
Traffic workload analysis optimizes staffing. Understanding peak hours enables efficient resource allocation and ensures optimal customer service during busy periods.
Traffic workload for JJ Fish and Chicken peaks between 10 AM and 8 PM, with the highest activity around 5-6 PM. There is minimal activity between midnight and 10 AM. This data suggests staffing and operational adjustments should align with peak traffic hours.
Consumer segments guide marketing. Analyzing gender and generational mix informs targeted campaigns and tailored messaging for increased engagement and conversions.
Women show a higher affinity (114%) for JJ Fish and Chicken compared to men (87%). Gen X demonstrates the highest affinity (146%), while Gen Y (88%) and Gen Z (72%) are under-indexed. This data guides targeted marketing and positioning strategies based on demographic insights.