Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
See what factors influence Hanlin Tea performance in the Taiwan and how they change over time
See what factors influence Hanlin Tea performance in the Taiwan and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
An analysis of Hanlin Tea' competitors in the Taiwan
An analysis of Hanlin Tea' competitors in the Taiwan
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Search among the top brands by number of locations
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
Hanlin Tea is in the top 2% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance percentile shows brand's foot traffic share, indicating competitive strength and customer preference within the industry.
Hanlin Tea's market performance is at the 98th percentile, indicating a leading position. This signifies a strong market presence and high customer preference compared to competitors. Peers in similar range: Ah Hong Shi Turkey Rice, 饗食鍋-永和創始店, 彭記鵝肉大王-西屯必吃鵝肉|特色小吃|街邊美食|平價小吃|台灣小吃|在地推薦美食, 桔太郎食堂《招牌丼飯、串燒》宜蘭熱門串燒店｜平價居酒屋｜深夜食堂｜晚餐宵夜｜親子友善｜寵物友善｜必吃｜美食推薦, 小小麥 一中店｜裝修完成 全新2樓（全日供餐）, Brother Restaurant.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects customer contentment, impacting loyalty and brand reputation. Higher CSAT correlates with repeat business and positive word-of-mouth.
Hanlin Tea's overall CSAT is 49%, a decrease of 7.7pp year-over-year. Zhubei City shows the highest CSAT at 100% with a growth of 41.4pp, while Tainan shows a decrease in CSAT of -20.7pp. This indicates varying levels of customer satisfaction across different cities.
Average check (Avg Check) reflects spending per transaction, indicating pricing strategy effectiveness and customer spending habits at Hanlin Tea.
Hanlin Tea's overall average check is 421.4 TWD, an increase of 8.6% year-over-year. Taipei reports an average check of 500 TWD with 0% growth, suggesting stable spending habits in this city. The average check dynamic data remains consistent across the months analyzed.
Number of outlets indicates brand reach and market presence. A higher outlet count can suggest wider availability and potential market dominance.
Hanlin Tea has the highest number of outlets in Tainan and Taoyuan City, each with 5 outlets. Taichung and Kaohsiung each have 4 outlets. This distribution indicates stronger market presence in these cities compared to others, like Taibao City, Wujie, and Zhubei City, which have only 1 outlet each.
Identifying top competitors through cross-visitation reveals direct rivals and customer preferences, informing competitive strategies and market positioning.
Hanlin Tea's top competitors based on customer cross-visitation are Starbucks (10.14%), McDonald's (7.97%), Ba Fang Yun Ji (5.07%), KFC (3.62%), and 海底捞 (3.62%). This indicates that customers who visit Hanlin Tea also frequently visit these brands, possibly for similar or alternative dining options.
Traffic workload analysis by hour reveals peak operational times, optimizing staffing, resource allocation, and promotional strategies for Hanlin Tea.
Hanlin Tea experiences peak traffic workload between 11:00 and 21:00, with the highest workload around 12:00-17:00. There is minimal activity between 0:00 and 9:00. This data suggests focusing resources and promotions during peak hours to maximize efficiency and sales.
Consumer segment analysis informs targeted marketing strategies. Understanding gender and generational preferences improves engagement and brand resonance.
Hanlin Tea's customer base shows a higher affinity among women (104 index) compared to men (96 index). Gen Y exhibits the highest affinity (153 index), while Gen Z is relatively under-indexed (76 index). This data informs targeted marketing and product offerings.