Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
See what factors influence 附近美食 performance in the Taiwan and how they change over time
See what factors influence 附近美食 performance in the Taiwan and how they change over time
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jul – Sep 25
附近美食 is ahead of most brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
An analysis of 附近美食' competitors in the Taiwan
An analysis of 附近美食' competitors in the Taiwan
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance percentile reveals brand's share of foot traffic, showing competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
附近美食's market performance is at the 67th percentile, indicating an average/above average market standing. This suggests moderate competitive strength. Performance peers in the same percentile range include 人从众厚切牛排, King Of Hot Pot, 曾記麻糬, Shabu Shabu, Din Tai Fung, and 牛山.牛肉麵.燒肉飯.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects customer loyalty and brand perception, directly impacting retention and revenue growth.
The overall CSAT for 附近美食 is 86%, a decrease of 3.8 percentage points year-over-year. Caotun Township shows the highest CSAT at 98% with a growth of 12.9 percentage points, while Zhuangwei has a CSAT of 96% with a decrease of 3.6 percentage points.
Average check (AvgCheck) indicates spending per customer, crucial for revenue analysis and pricing strategy optimization.
The overall average check for 附近美食 is 330 TWD, a 4.2% increase year-over-year. Taipei has the highest average check at 546.4 TWD, while Kaohsiung has an average check of 344.9 TWD.
Outlet count reflects brand reach and market presence, influencing accessibility and potential customer base.
附近美食 has the most outlets in Taichung (18), followed by New Taipei (13) and Taoyuan City (11). Yuchi Township has the fewest outlets (1), indicating a limited presence in that area.
Identifying top competitors helps refine strategies by understanding customer choices and competitive landscape.
The top competitors for 附近美食, based on cross-visitation, are McDonald's (5.06%), Starbucks (3.89%), 店 (2.20%), Mos Burger (1.56%), and Sushiro (1.43%). This indicates shared customer base with these brands.
Traffic workload analysis reveals peak hours, enabling efficient staffing and resource allocation for optimal service.
Traffic workload for 附近美食 peaks at 18:00 (50.91) and 12:00 (40.44), indicating the busiest hours. The lowest traffic is between 2:00 and 4:00, suggesting minimal activity during these hours.
Understanding consumer segments by gender and generation informs targeted marketing and positioning strategies.
Women show a slightly higher affinity (105) than men (95). Gen Z exhibits the highest affinity (253), followed by Gen X (167). Gen Y is under-indexed (21), suggesting lower engagement compared to other generations.