Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
See what factors influence Earthbar performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Earthbar performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
Search among the top brands by number of locations
An analysis of Earthbar' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Earthbar' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
Earthbar is in the top 3% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance percentile reflects a brand’s share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference.
Earthbar's market performance is in the 97th percentile, indicating a leading position. This means Earthbar captures a significantly higher share of customer foot traffic than most competitors. Its performance peers within the same percentile include The Codfather, Kabob Palace, Romanelli's Garden Cafe, Kabab Shack & Grill, Los Jefes, and taïm mediterranean kitchen.
CSAT reflects the degree to which customers are happy with a company's products, services, and experiences and can drive loyalty.
Earthbar's overall customer satisfaction (CSAT) is 84%, with a 5.4 percentage point increase year-over-year. This indicates a strong positive sentiment among customers. In California, CSAT also stands at 84%. The CSAT dynamic data shows fluctuations month to month, suggesting areas for continuous monitoring and improvement.
Average check is a key performance indicator (KPI) revealing customer spending habits and potential revenue per transaction.
Earthbar's overall average check is $16.70, up 5.3% year-over-year, indicating increased spending per customer. California's average check mirrors this value. The monthly average check fluctuates, suggesting variations in spending depending on the period.
Outlet count indicates brand reach, market penetration, and growth opportunities in the cafe and restaurant industry.
Earthbar has 33 outlets in California, indicating a concentrated presence in this state. A stable number of outlets suggests a steady market footprint during the analyzed period with no significant expansion or contraction.
Identifying competitors is crucial for strategic positioning, understanding market dynamics, and capitalizing on opportunities.
Earthbar's top competitors, based on customer cross-visitation, include In-N-Out Burger (11.11%), Chipotle Mexican Grill (11.11%), Dickey's Barbecue Pit (7.41%), Dialog Cafe (7.41%), and McDonald's (7.41%). These brands share a customer base with Earthbar, revealing potential areas for competitive analysis and strategic differentiation.
Traffic workload reveals peak hours, enabling optimized staffing, resource allocation, and customer experience management.
Earthbar's peak traffic workload occurs between 7:00 AM and 6:00 PM, with the highest workload around 11:00 AM and 12:00 PM (49.86% and 48.12% respectively). This indicates the need for optimal staffing and resource allocation during these peak hours. Traffic is minimal between 11:00 PM and 6:00 AM.
Analyzing consumer segments helps tailor marketing strategies for maximum impact and relevance to different demographic groups.
Earthbar's customer base shows a higher affinity among women (index 104) compared to men (index 96), suggesting a stronger appeal to female consumers. Gen X (index 132) and Gen Z (index 142) show higher affinity than Gen Y (index 93), indicating stronger engagement from these generations. This suggests targeted marketing should consider Gen X and Gen Z preferences.