Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
See what factors influence Dippin'Dots performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Dippin'Dots performance in the United States and how they change over time
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
An analysis of Dippin'Dots' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Dippin'Dots' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jul – Sep 25
Dippin'Dots is in the lower 28% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance percentile reveals brand's share of foot traffic, indicating competitive strength and customer preference.
Dippin'Dots' market performance is in the lower 28%, indicating a lagging position. This means the brand captures less foot traffic compared to competitors. Performance peers in a similar range include King's Hawaiian Bakery & Restaurant, Flama Llama, Meating Street Seafood & Steakhouse, The Post Sports Bar & Grill, DarSalam Restaurant & Catering, and Brooklyn Pizzeria.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects brand perception and loyalty, directly impacting revenue and long-term sustainability.
Dippin'Dots' overall CSAT is 71%, a 7.9 percentage point increase year-over-year. However, Florida shows a decrease of 8 percentage points, reaching 80%. The CSAT trend from June to August 2025 shows a decline, with a high of 76.74% in June and a low of 61.11% in August.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and market presence, influencing accessibility and overall revenue potential.
Dippin'Dots has the highest number of outlets in Texas (28), followed by Florida (16) and California (13). Illinois has 9 outlets, North Carolina has 7, Maryland and Louisiana each have 5, and Georgia, Virginia, and Pennsylvania each have 4.
Identifying top competitors helps refine strategies, understand market dynamics, and capture a larger customer base.
The top competitors for Dippin'Dots, based on customer cross-visitation, are McDonald's (13.70%), Pineapple Willy's Restaurant (12.33%), Chick-fil-A (10.96%), Dunkin' (8.22%), and Burger King (6.85%). This indicates that customers who visit Dippin'Dots also frequent these establishments.
Traffic workload analysis reveals peak hours, enabling efficient staffing and resource allocation for optimal service.
Dippin'Dots experiences peak traffic workload between 12:00 PM and 8:00 PM, with the highest workload at 3:00 PM (51.95%). Traffic is significantly lower during early morning hours, indicating a need for adjusted staffing during off-peak times.
Understanding consumer segments allows for targeted marketing, personalized experiences, and improved customer engagement.
Dippin'Dots' customer base shows a higher affinity among women (index 118) compared to men (index 83). Gen X (index 117) and Gen Z (index 138) show high affinity, while Gen Y (index 84) is under-indexed.