Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
See what factors influence Crispy Cones performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Crispy Cones performance in the United States and how they change over time
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jul – Sep 25
Crispy Cones is in the lower 39% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
An analysis of Crispy Cones' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Crispy Cones' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance shows brand's share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Crispy Cones' market performance is in the lower 39% in the United States' Cafe & Restaurants industry, which is below average. Performance peers in the same percentile include Original ChopShop, Waffle Love, Johnny's Italian Steakhouse, Zanzibar, Var 37, and Unregular Pizza. This indicates a need to improve market presence.
Customer satisfaction reflects brand perception and loyalty, directly impacting revenue and long-term sustainability.
Crispy Cones has an overall customer satisfaction of 83%, a 2.5 percentage point increase year-over-year. Satisfaction varies by state, with Florida at 87% and Tennessee at 72%. The CSAT trend shows a slight increase from June to August 2025, indicating positive customer experience improvements.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and expansion, reflecting growth strategy and market penetration.
Crispy Cones has a varying number of outlets across different states. Utah and Idaho each have 3 outlets, while Arizona, Florida, and Tennessee each have 2. Pennsylvania, Arkansas, Indiana, North Carolina and South Carolina each have 1. This distribution shows a concentration in certain states.
Competitor analysis identifies key rivals and customer overlap, informing competitive strategies and market positioning.
The top competitors for Crispy Cones, based on customer cross-visitation, are McDonald's (5.10%), Carvel (4.46%), Starbucks (3.82%), Taco Bell (2.55%), and Chipotle Mexican Grill (2.55%). This indicates that customers who visit Crispy Cones also frequent these establishments.
Traffic workload analysis optimizes staffing and resource allocation, enhancing operational efficiency and customer experience.
Crispy Cones experiences peak traffic workload between 18:00 and 20:00, with the highest workload at 19:00 (55.75). Traffic is minimal in the early morning hours. This data suggests optimal staffing during evening hours.
Understanding consumer segments enables targeted marketing, improving engagement and ROI by tailoring strategies to specific demographics.
Crispy Cones' customer base shows a higher affinity among women (114) compared to men (87). Gen Z (126) and Gen Y (115) show higher affinity than Gen X (87). This suggests marketing should focus on younger, female demographics.