Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
See what factors influence Comme Chez Nous performance in the Belgium and how they change over time
See what factors influence Comme Chez Nous performance in the Belgium and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
Search among the top brands by number of locations
An analysis of Comme Chez Nous' competitors in the Belgium
An analysis of Comme Chez Nous' competitors in the Belgium
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
Comme Chez Nous is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market Performance shows brand's share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Comme Chez Nous is a leading brand with a market performance percentile of 99, placing it in the top 1% of brands. This indicates a strong market position relative to peers like The Juicy Seafood, Cliff Brussels, Grimbergen Cafe, Noordzee, My Sweet Liège, and Van Hecke, all at the same percentile.
Customer Satisfaction is vital for brand loyalty and growth. Monitoring CSAT helps understand customer perception and identify areas for improvement.
Overall customer satisfaction for Comme Chez Nous is 70%, a decrease of 24.5 percentage points year-over-year. Satisfaction varies by region: Flanders at 74% with a decrease of 23.5 percentage points, and Wallonia at 71% with an increase of 18.5 percentage points. This mixed performance suggests regional differences in customer experience.
Average Check reveals customer spending habits. Tracking it helps optimize pricing and promotions to boost revenue and profitability.
The average check for Comme Chez Nous is 11.2 EUR, a decrease of 23.4% year-over-year. In Flanders, the average check is 11.7 EUR with no change. The fluctuating average check dynamic over the observed months indicates variability in customer spending patterns.
Outlet count indicates brand reach. Knowing where outlets are located helps in assessing market coverage and guiding expansion strategies.
Comme Chez Nous has 28 outlets in Flanders and 2 in Wallonia. This shows a concentration of outlets in Flanders, indicating a stronger presence in that region compared to Wallonia.
Competitive analysis highlights key rivals. Knowing who else customers visit helps refine strategies and improve market positioning.
Customers of Comme Chez Nous also frequent McDonald's (14.29% cross-visitation), Quick (12.24%), Panos (10.20%), Burger King (8.16%), and Café Trappisten Westmalle (4.08%). This indicates that Comme Chez Nous competes with these brands for customer visits.
Traffic workload shows busy hours. Understanding customer traffic helps optimize staffing and resources to improve service efficiency.
Comme Chez Nous experiences peak traffic workload between 12:00 and 17:00, with the highest traffic around noon. The lowest traffic is during the night, between 0:00 and 4:00. This data is the average traffic by hour of day. This data helps plan staffing effectively.
Consumer segments guide marketing. Understanding demographics helps tailor promotions to boost engagement and customer loyalty.
Comme Chez Nous shows high affinity with women (index 91) and men (index 106) which indicates a slightly stronger over-representation among male consumers. The brand also shows high affinity with Gen X (index 157), and under-representation among Gen Y (index 65) and Gen Z (index 88) which suggests a stronger resonance with older generations.