Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
See what factors influence Coffee Beanery performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Coffee Beanery performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
Search among the top brands by number of locations
An analysis of Coffee Beanery' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Coffee Beanery' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
Coffee Beanery is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance shows brand’s share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the Cafe & Restaurants industry.
Coffee Beanery's market performance is in the top 1% within the Cafe & Restaurants sector in the United States, indicating a leading position. This high percentile suggests strong brand presence and customer preference compared to its competitors. Performance peers in a similar range are Via Napoli Ristorante e Pizzeria, Caffè Milano, EZ Eatz by Yaya, Zocalo, Tikka and Grill, Frank's Pizza & Pasta.
Customer satisfaction is crucial as it directly impacts loyalty, retention, and brand reputation within the competitive Cafe & Restaurants industry.
Coffee Beanery's overall customer satisfaction is at 90%, a 12.2 percentage point increase year-over-year. Texas shows the highest CSAT at 98%, while Georgia shows the most growth at 61.7 percentage points. The CSAT has increased over the period from May to July 2025.
Average check reflects customer spending habits and is key for revenue optimization and understanding pricing strategy effectiveness in the Cafe & Restaurants sector.
Coffee Beanery's overall average check is $9.80, a 5.5% decrease year-over-year. Maryland has the highest average check at $14.00. The average check fluctuated between $9.32 and $10.58 from May to July 2025.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and market penetration, directly affecting accessibility and overall revenue potential in the Cafe & Restaurants industry.
Coffee Beanery has the most outlets in Michigan (8), followed by Texas (3). Maryland and Georgia each have 2 outlets. Pennsylvania, New York, Virginia, New Jersey, Tennessee and Florida each have 1 outlet.
Identifying top competitors helps refine competitive strategies, understand market dynamics, and improve customer retention in the Cafe & Restaurants industry.
The top competitors for Coffee Beanery, based on customer cross-visitation, are Starbucks (9.09%), Cracker Barrel Old Country Store (4.96%), McDonald's (4.96%), Burger King (4.96%), and Dunkin' (4.13%).
Understanding traffic workload by hours helps optimize staffing, manage resources, and enhance customer experience during peak and off-peak times.
Traffic workload for Coffee Beanery peaks between 9 AM and 1 PM, with the highest traffic workload at 11 AM (60.92). Traffic is lowest during the early morning hours, between midnight and 4 AM.
Analyzing consumer segments informs targeted marketing, product development, and customer engagement strategies for the Cafe & Restaurants industry.
Women (affinity index: 125) are overrepresented among Coffee Beanery's consumers, while men (affinity index: 77) are underrepresented. Gen Y (120) and Gen Z (128) are overrepresented, while Gen X (86) is underrepresented.