Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
See what factors influence Chicken Kitchen performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Chicken Kitchen performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Chicken Kitchen' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Chicken Kitchen' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
Search among the top brands by number of locations
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
Chicken Kitchen is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance shows brand’s share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Chicken Kitchen's market performance is in the top 1% of brands, indicating a leading position in the Cafe & Restaurants industry in the United States. This high percentile suggests strong customer preference and competitive strength. Performance peers like Paesanos Riverwalk, New York Eats, Double T Diner, The Iberian Pig, Fin & Feathers Restaurants, and Dock 17 share a similar leading position.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects how well a brand meets customer expectations, impacting loyalty and repurchase rates.
Chicken Kitchen's overall customer satisfaction is 77%, a decrease of 4 percentage points year-over-year. In Florida, the CSAT is also 77%, with a decrease of 3.6 percentage points. The CSAT dynamic data shows fluctuations, peaking in July 2025. This indicates a need to address factors impacting customer sentiment.
Average check reveals customer spending habits, crucial for revenue forecasting and menu optimization.
Chicken Kitchen's overall average check is $18.5, up 9.4% year-over-year, indicating increased customer spending. In Florida, the average check is $18.6 USD, with no change in growth. The average check dynamic data shows variations, peaking in July 2025. This suggests effective upselling strategies or changes in customer order patterns.
Outlet count reflects brand reach and expansion, influencing market presence and accessibility.
Chicken Kitchen has 33 outlets in Florida and 1 in North Carolina. This concentrated presence in Florida suggests a strong regional focus. The outlet distribution indicates the brand's current operational footprint and potential for expansion into new markets.
Competitor analysis identifies key rivals and customer preferences, shaping competitive strategies.
Chicken Kitchen's top competitors based on cross-visitation are McDonald's (10.42%), Burger King (8.85%), Wendy's (6.77%), Pollo Tropical (4.69%), and Taco Bell (4.69%). These brands represent the primary alternatives customers consider, highlighting the competitive landscape.
Traffic workload analysis reveals peak hours, aiding staff scheduling and resource allocation.
Chicken Kitchen experiences peak traffic workload between 11 AM and 8 PM, with the highest activity around 1 PM (64.02%). The lowest traffic is during the early morning hours (0-5 AM). This data is useful for optimizing staffing and resource allocation during peak service times.
Understanding consumer segments enables targeted marketing and customized product offerings.
Chicken Kitchen's customer base shows a higher affinity towards women (79%) and Men (119%). The Generation mix shows higher affinity for Gen Y (126%) but under-representation for Gen Z (48%) and Gen X(84%). This suggest opportunities to better target marketing towards specific generations.