Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
See what factors influence CFC performance in the Indonesia and how they change over time
See what factors influence CFC performance in the Indonesia and how they change over time
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jul – Sep 25
CFC is in the lower 41% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
An analysis of CFC' competitors in the Indonesia
An analysis of CFC' competitors in the Indonesia
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance percentile shows brand's share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference.
CFC's market performance is at the 41st percentile, indicating a below average market position. This means CFC captures less foot traffic than most competitors. Performance peers in similar range: Jagarawa, Tanabambu, SNIVV, blengerr ruhui rahayu, Wizzmie Pasuruan, Fit Fuel Salad & Smoothie Bar.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects customer loyalty and brand perception, directly impacting revenue and long-term growth.
CFC's overall customer satisfaction is 63%, a decrease of 8.1 percentage points year-over-year. In Java, CSAT is 59%, down 12.4 percentage points. This indicates declining customer sentiment, especially in Java, requiring attention to service and product quality.
Average check reveals customer spending habits, influencing revenue strategies and menu optimization for increased profitability.
The average check for CFC in Java is 75.4K IDR, with no change year-over-year. Dynamic data shows fluctuations, peaking in July 2025 at 83522.73 IDR. Monitoring these trends can inform pricing and promotional strategies.
Outlet count indicates market reach and brand presence, influencing accessibility and overall revenue potential.
CFC has 100 outlets in Java, 9 in Sumatra, 4 each in Kalimantan and Sulawesi, and 1 each in Maluku and Lesser Sunda Islands. Java dominates CFC's presence. Expansion in other regions could increase market share.
Identifying top competitors helps refine strategies, understand market dynamics, and capture a larger customer base.
CFC's top competitors based on customer cross-visitation are KFC (8.98%), Pizza Hut (7.78%), McDonald's (5.99%), Solaria (4.79%), and Burger King (4.19%). These brands attract a significant portion of CFC's potential customers.
Traffic workload analysis optimizes staffing, resource allocation, and service efficiency during peak hours.
CFC experiences peak traffic between 10 AM and 8 PM, with the highest workload around 6 PM (53.10%). Traffic is lowest in the early morning hours. Staffing and resources should align with these peak and off-peak times.
Understanding consumer segments enables targeted marketing, product development, and personalized customer experiences.
Women are overrepresented among CFC's consumers (Affinity Index 69), while men are significantly overrepresented (Affinity Index 140). Gen X is highly overrepresented (Affinity Index 152), Gen Y is slightly underrepresented (Affinity Index 98), and Gen Z is underrepresented (Affinity Index 78).