Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
See what factors influence ATL Wings performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence ATL Wings performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
ATL Wings is in the top 2% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
An analysis of ATL Wings' competitors in the United States
An analysis of ATL Wings' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance percentile reveals competitive strength and customer preference, crucial for assessing brand's industry standing.
ATL Wings holds a market performance percentile of 98, positioning it as a leading brand in the Cafe & Restaurants industry within the United States. This indicates a strong competitive position, placing it in the top 2% of brands. Performance peers in the same percentile range include FITOOR, Zanzibar Soul Fusion, Woodson's Local Tap + Kitchen, Que Bueno! Mexican Grille, Mo's Irish Pub, and Suprabhat.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects customer contentment, directly impacting loyalty and revenue. Tracking CSAT identifies areas for service improvement.
ATL Wings' overall CSAT is 59%, a decrease of 9.3 percentage points year-over-year. In Arizona, the CSAT is also 59%, mirroring the overall decline. This decrease suggests a potential need to investigate and address customer concerns to improve satisfaction levels.
Average check reflects spending per customer, indicating pricing strategy effectiveness and customer value. Monitoring helps optimize revenue.
The overall average check for ATL Wings is $22 USD, a 4.6% increase year-over-year. Arizona's average check is also $22 USD, showing no change. This suggests a stable average spending per customer in Arizona, aligning with the overall brand average.
Number of outlets indicates brand reach and market presence. Tracking outlet count informs expansion strategies and market penetration.
ATL Wings has 17 outlets in Arizona. This number provides a snapshot of its physical presence and operational scale within the state. There is no growth information provided for number of outlets.
Competitor analysis identifies key rivals and customer preferences, informing competitive strategies and differentiation efforts for ATL Wings.
The top competitors for ATL Wings, based on customer cross-visitation, are McDonald's (13.89%), Jack in the Box and Chick-fil-A (9.26% each), Burger King and Starbucks (8.33% each). This data highlights major fast-food chains as significant competitors, suggesting shared customer bases.
Traffic workload distribution helps optimize staffing and resource allocation, ensuring efficient service during peak hours at ATL Wings locations.
ATL Wings experiences peak traffic between 11 AM and 8 PM, with the highest workload between 5 PM and 6 PM (65.15%). Traffic is minimal between midnight and 10 AM, indicating the need for focused resource management during peak hours.
Analyzing consumer segments tailors marketing, enhancing relevance and engagement by understanding gender and generational preferences.
ATL Wings shows a high affinity with women (78, delta -21.67), suggesting that women are a core part of the customer base. There is also a high affinity for men (120, delta 19.99), indicating that they are also highly engaged. In terms of generation, Gen Y shows high affinity (132, delta 31.89), whereas Gen X (73, delta -27.37) and Gen Z (52, delta -48.16) are under-indexed.