Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
See what factors influence Anna's House performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Anna's House performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
Search among the top brands by number of locations
An analysis of Anna's House' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Anna's House' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
Anna's House is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance shows brand's share of foot traffic, revealing competitive strength and customer preference in the Cafe & Restaurants industry.
Anna's House holds the 99th percentile, a leading position. This indicates a strong market presence, suggesting high customer preference compared to its peers in the Cafe & Restaurants industry. Other brands in similar range: Conrad's Seafood, Hawaiian Island Grill, BoSa Donuts, Lava Lounge, Walden's Coffeehouse - Breakfast & Coffee in Reno, Kuppanna's Thiru Kuppusamy Unavagam - South Indian Restaurant.
Customer satisfaction reflects brand perception, impacting loyalty and revenue. Increased satisfaction often correlates with higher customer retention rates.
Anna's House boasts an overall customer satisfaction of 81%, with a 0.6 percentage point increase year-over-year. In Michigan, the CSAT is also 81%, showing a corresponding 0.6 percentage point increase. This indicates a positive trend in customer happiness.
Average check reveals customer spending habits. Tracking this KPI helps assess pricing strategies and identify opportunities for revenue optimization.
Anna's House has an average check of $20.20, a decrease of 0.4% year-over-year. The average check in Michigan is also $20.20. The average check was highest in July 2025, at $20.71 and lowest in June 2025, at $19.93.
Outlet count indicates market reach. More outlets can mean greater brand visibility and accessibility, potentially boosting revenue and market share.
Anna's House operates 12 outlets in Michigan. This shows a defined market presence concentrated in a specific geographic area. This figure helps in evaluating Anna's House's geographic footprint.
Competitor analysis identifies key players. This understanding allows for strategic positioning and differentiation to gain a competitive edge and attract customers.
Anna's House's top competitors based on customer cross-visitation are Culver's (6.76%), McDonald's (6.49%), Starbucks (4.59%), Taco Bell (4.32%), and Chick-fil-A (3.24%). These percentages indicate the proportion of Anna's House customers who also visit these competitor locations.
Traffic workload insights optimize staffing. Analyzing hourly traffic patterns enables efficient resource allocation, enhancing service and customer satisfaction.
Anna's House experiences peak traffic between 9 AM and 12 PM, with the highest workload at 11 AM (56.83). There is no recorded traffic from 3 PM to 6 AM. This information will help management optimize operational scheduling.
Consumer insights enable targeted campaigns. Understanding gender and generational preferences allows tailored marketing, improving engagement and ROI.
Women show higher affinity (107) toward Anna's House compared to men (93). Gen X shows a high affinity(131), while Gen Y is under-indexed(64). Gen Z also display higher affinity (114). This can inform targeted campaigns.