Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Zippy's is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Zippy's performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Zippy's performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Zippy's' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Zippy's' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance shows brand’s share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Zippy's, with a market performance percentile of 99 in the United States' Cafe & Restaurants industry, holds a leading market position. This high percentile means that Zippy's captures a significantly larger share of customer visits compared to its competitors. Its performance peers are Lee's Sandwiches, La Chingada Cocina Mexicana, Tim Ho Wan, Halls Chophouse, Fatboiz Premium Gourmet, and Sardi's Pollo A La Brasa within the same percentile range.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects brand perception. Tracking CSAT helps understand customer loyalty and identify areas for service improvement.
Zippy's overall customer satisfaction is 67%, a decrease of 4.2 percentage points year-over-year. Nevada shows a CSAT of 68% with a 0.8 percentage point increase, while Hawaii shows 66% with a 7.5 percentage point decrease. The CSAT dynamic data shows fluctuations between 65.59% and 71.77% from April to June 2025.
Average check reveals spending habits. Tracking average check helps understand revenue trends and informs pricing and promotional strategies.
Zippy's overall average check is $27.10, an increase of 12.9% year-over-year. In Nevada, the average check is $35.10, while in Hawaii, it is $23.10. The average check has fluctuated between $22.95 and $29.75 from April to June 2025.
Number of outlets reflects brand reach. Monitoring outlet distribution helps assess market penetration and expansion opportunities.
Zippy's has 22 outlets in Hawaii and 1 outlet in Nevada. The distribution of outlets highlights the brand's established presence in Hawaii, with a smaller footprint in Nevada.
Competitor analysis highlights competitive landscape. Understanding competitors helps identify strategic opportunities and defend against competitive threats.
The top 5 brands that Zippy's customers also visit are McDonald's (13.53%), Starbucks (8.58%), Liliha Bakery (5.61%), Taco Bell (5.28%), and Jack in the Box (4.95%). This indicates significant cross-visitation with major fast-food chains and a local bakery.
Traffic workload identifies peak hours. Understanding traffic patterns enables efficient staffing and resource allocation.
Zippy's experiences peak traffic between 18:00 (70.07%) and 19:00 (72.06%), with significant activity from 11:00 to 21:00. Traffic is minimal between 0:00 and 5:00.
Consumer segment analysis tailors marketing. Understanding consumer demographics enhances targeting and engagement strategies.
Women have very high affinity (83% delta - it seems the data is corrupt and doesn't represent affinity, but rather the overall share) while Men slightly above average consumer base (114% delta - it seems the data is corrupt and doesn't represent affinity, but rather the overall share). Gen X index high affinity (123% delta - it seems the data is corrupt and doesn't represent affinity, but rather the overall share), Gen Y average (93% delta - it seems the data is corrupt and doesn't represent affinity, but rather the overall share), and Gen Z affinity relatively lower (57% delta - it seems the data is corrupt and doesn't represent affinity, but rather the overall share).