Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Vino Volo is in the top 2% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Vino Volo performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Vino Volo performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Vino Volo' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Vino Volo' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance reveals brand share of foot traffic, indicating competitive strength and customer preference.
Vino Volo's market performance is at the 98th percentile, indicating a leading position in the Cafe & Restaurants industry in the United States. This high percentile means that Vino Volo captures a significant share of customer foot traffic compared to its competitors. Brands in the same percentile range are: Yoimi Sushi & Hibachi, King Buffet, VARA Juice, Chuck's Fish, Gingham's Homestyle Restaurant, Golden Horn Restaurant.
CSAT reflects customer happiness. Tracking it identifies strengths and areas needing improvement to boost loyalty.
Vino Volo's overall customer satisfaction (CSAT) is 86%, up 4.6 percentage points year-over-year, indicating improved customer happiness. CSAT varies by state, with New Jersey at 100% and Texas at 64%. There are down growth values in Florida, California and Texas that should be carefully monitored.
Average check reflects spending per customer. Monitoring helps optimize pricing and menu strategies for revenue.
Vino Volo's overall average check is $36.7, down 11.8% year-over-year. Average check varies by state, with California at $44.2 USD, Missouri at $40 USD, and Florida at $34.2 USD. No growth value for the mentioned states, indicating a stablization.
Outlet count indicates brand reach. Tracking it informs expansion strategy to capture market share.
Vino Volo has a varying number of outlets across different states in the United States. California has the most outlets at 6. Several states including Pennsylvania, Florida, Missouri, New Jersey, and Texas each have 2 outlets. Minnesota, Georgia, and Wisconsin each have 1 outlet.
Competitor analysis identifies top rivals. This insights help refine strategies to gain a competitive edge.
Vino Volo's top competitors based on cross-visitation are Starbucks (6.15%), McDonald's (4.62%), Barrio Tacos (3.08%), Tropical Smoothie Cafe (3.08%), and First Watch (3.08%).
Traffic workload analysis shows peak hours. Staffing and promotions can then match customer demand.
Vino Volo experiences peak traffic workload between 11 AM and 4 PM, with the highest workload around 1 PM and 2 PM (55.35 and 54.80 respectively). Traffic is lowest in the early morning hours (0-4 AM).
Understanding consumer segments enables targeted marketing, improving engagement and brand resonance.
Vino Volo's consumer base shows a higher affinity for women (index 109) and Gen X (index 125), suggesting these groups are overrepresented compared to the average consumer. There is lower affinity among men (index 93) and Gen Z (index 73).