Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Steak Escape is in the top 2% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Steak Escape performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Steak Escape performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Steak Escape' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Steak Escape' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market Performance percentile shows brand’s share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Steak Escape's MARKET PERFORMANCE percentile is 98, indicating a leading position. This means it captures a significant portion of customer traffic compared to its competitors. Performance peers in the same percentile range include Umekes Fish Market Bar & Grill, Pizza De Miami, Marina Indian Restaurant, Casa Calabria, Rocco's Little Chicago, and El Encanto.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) measures how happy customers are with their experiences, impacting loyalty and brand reputation.
Steak Escape's overall CSAT is 73%, up by 8.6 percentage points year-over-year. Indiana has the highest CSAT at 95%, while Mississippi has the lowest at 54%. A positive trend is seen in most states, with the exception of Tennessee and Mississippi. Customer satisfaction grew from 73.54% to 69.23% during the observed period.
Average check reflects customer spending per visit, influencing revenue and profitability.
Steak Escape's overall average check is $16.30, a decrease of 7.9% year-over-year. Mississippi has the highest average check at $17.40. West Virginia has the lowest average check at $14.20. The average check fluctuated slightly, with a peak in May 2025.
Number of outlets indicates brand reach and market presence, affecting accessibility and growth potential.
Steak Escape has the highest number of outlets in Mississippi and Ohio (6 each). There are 4 outlets in West Virginia, 3 in Tennessee, and fewer in other states like Wisconsin, California, North Carolina, Indiana and South Dakota. This distribution provides insights into regional market penetration.
Identifying competitors reveals the competitive landscape and helps in strategic positioning.
The top competitors for Steak Escape, based on customer cross-visitation, are McDonald's (20.59%), Burger King (10.29%), Chick-fil-A (10.29%), Waffle House (8.82%), and Domino's Pizza (7.35%). This indicates that Steak Escape customers also frequent these fast-food chains.
Traffic workload analysis identifies peak hours, enabling optimal staffing and resource allocation.
Steak Escape experiences peak traffic between 11 AM and 7 PM, with the highest workload at 12 PM. Traffic is minimal during early morning hours. Understanding these patterns helps optimize staffing and operations to meet demand.
Understanding consumer segments helps tailor marketing efforts for maximum impact and engagement.
Steak Escape has high affinity with women (Index 113) and Gen X (Index 160). Gen Y (Index 69) and Gen Z (Index 38) are under-indexed. The brand can focus its marketing and products based on these consumer affinities.