Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Sneaky Pete's is in the top 4% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Sneaky Pete's performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Sneaky Pete's performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Sneaky Pete's' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Sneaky Pete's' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance percentile reveals brand's share of foot traffic, indicating competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Sneaky Pete's market performance is in the top 4% (96th percentile), indicating a leading market position. This signifies strong customer preference compared to peers like The Brazos Landing, McLoons Lobster Shack, Tandoorish, Issho Izakaya & Sushi, Magnolia Room Cafeteria, and Pictured Rocks Pizza.
Customer satisfaction scores are crucial for understanding brand perception, loyalty, and the likelihood of repeat business and positive word-of-mouth.
Sneaky Pete's boasts a high customer satisfaction (CSAT) score of 93%, showing an increase of 24.3 percentage points year-over-year. In Alabama, customer satisfaction is also 93%. The CSAT dynamic data shows consistent high satisfaction around 94.54% from April to June 2025.
Average check value shows how much customers spend per transaction, revealing pricing strategy effectiveness and customer spending habits.
The overall average check for Sneaky Pete's is $12.8, which is a decrease of 6.9% year-over-year. The average check in Alabama is $12.8. Dynamic data shows fluctuations from $10.38 in April 2025, peaking at $16.82 in May, and settling at $11.88 in June.
Number of outlets indicates the brand's market reach and presence, influencing accessibility and overall brand awareness.
Sneaky Pete's has 24 outlets located in Alabama. This indicates the brand's established physical presence within the state during the reported period.
Identifying top competitors helps understand the competitive landscape and refine strategies to maintain or improve market share.
Sneaky Pete's top competitors, based on customer cross-visitation, are McDonald's (22.58%), Arby's (14.52%), Jack's (14.52%), Taco Bell (12.90%), and Waffle House (11.29%). These brands capture a portion of Sneaky Pete's customer base.
Analyzing traffic workload by hour helps optimize staffing, resource allocation, and marketing efforts to match peak demand.
Sneaky Pete's experiences peak traffic between 8 AM and 1 PM, with the highest workload around noon (58.19%). The lowest traffic occurs between midnight and 4 AM. This data helps optimize operations based on hourly customer flow.
Understanding consumer segments allows for targeted marketing and product development, maximizing engagement and brand relevance.
Sneaky Pete's customer base is composed of 54% women (affinity -45.60) and 139% men (affinity 38.77). Among generations, Gen X demonstrates an affinity index of 129% (29.43), indicating over-representation. Gen Y shows an affinity index of 87% (-13.35), indicating under-representation.