Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Sauce on the Side is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Sauce on the Side performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Sauce on the Side performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Sauce on the Side' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Sauce on the Side' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance reveals brand's competitive strength and customer preference in the industry through its share of foot traffic.
Sauce on the Side's market performance is at the 99th percentile, indicating a leading position. This signifies a substantial share of customer traffic and strong brand preference compared to its peers like Ye Ole Fashioned Ice Cream & Sandwich Cafe, Sixth Ave Garden Gourmet Deli, Birria Los Primos, Huck Finn's Catfish, Red Fish, and Jordyn's Soul Cafe, all also at the 99th percentile.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) indicates brand loyalty and service quality, impacting long-term revenue and brand reputation.
Sauce on the Side has an overall CSAT of 89%, a slight decrease of 0.2 percentage points year-over-year. Missouri shows high CSAT (92%), while Illinois is significantly lower (60%) with a substantial decrease. This highlights regional performance disparities needing attention.
Average check reflects customer spending per visit, influencing revenue and profitability, and indicating pricing strategy effectiveness.
The overall average check for Sauce on the Side is $17.70, with no change year-over-year. Missouri's average check is $18.10, while Indiana's is $16.90. These differences suggest variations in menu preferences or pricing strategies across locations.
Number of outlets indicates brand reach and market penetration, reflecting expansion strategy and potential revenue streams.
Sauce on the Side has 9 outlets in Missouri, 2 in Indiana, and 1 in Illinois. The distribution shows a concentration of outlets in Missouri, suggesting that expansion efforts have been focused in that area.
Identifying competitors reveals the competitive landscape, informing strategic positioning and market share defense.
McDonald's (8.88%), Chick-fil-A (7.10%), Wendy's (5.33%), Sonic Drive-In (5.33%), and Sugarfire Smoke House (4.73%) are top competitors. These brands capture a significant share of Sauce on the Side's potential customer base, showing need for differentiation.
Traffic workload by hours reveals peak hours, enabling optimal staffing and resource allocation for customer satisfaction.
Traffic workload peaks between 11 AM and 7 PM, with the highest activity around 6 PM (58.63). Minimal traffic occurs between 10 PM and 10 AM, indicating the need to optimize staffing based on the workload hours.
Consumer segment analysis informs targeted marketing, enhancing brand affinity and optimizing customer engagement strategies.
Women (95) are slightly under-indexed compared to the average consumer. Men (104) shows a slightly higher affinity. Gen X (123) shows high affinity, while Gen Y (95) and Gen Z (98) shows under-indexed values.