Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Noble Roman's is in the top 6% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Noble Roman's performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Noble Roman's performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Noble Roman's' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Noble Roman's' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance reveals brand's foot traffic share, indicating competitive strength and customer preference versus industry rivals.
Noble Roman's, with a market performance of 94, is a leading brand, securing a top 6% position. This signifies strong customer preference and market share compared to competitors such as Hue Boston, Meno's Méxican Grill, The Oak Barrel, Time Market, Guy Fieri's El Burro Borracho, and famous, all in the same 94th percentile.
CSAT reflects customer happiness. Tracking changes identifies areas for improvement and ensures loyalty, driving repeat business and positive word-of-mouth.
Noble Roman's customer satisfaction (CSAT) is 80%, a decrease of 7.8 percentage points year-over-year. In Indiana, CSAT is 78%, down 6 percentage points, indicating a need to investigate and address customer concerns to improve satisfaction levels.
Average check indicates how much customers spend per visit. It reflects menu pricing, customer spending habits and the potential for revenue growth.
Noble Roman's overall average check is $16.30, a decrease of 8.6% year-over-year. In Indiana, the average check is $17.50 with no growth. The decline signals a need to evaluate pricing strategies or enhance order value.
Outlet count signals brand reach and market presence. Growth indicates expansion and investment, while distribution informs operational & marketing strategies.
Noble Roman's has 35 outlets in the United States. Indiana has the most with 25, followed by Ohio with 4, and Florida, California, Michigan, Nevada, Georgia, Illinois and Louisiana all at 1. This distribution highlights key markets and expansion opportunities.
Competitor analysis shows direct rivals. Cross-visitation data helps brands understand customer choices and refine strategies to attract and retain customers.
The top competitors for Noble Roman's are McDonald's (15.22%), Cracker Barrel Old Country Store (10.87%), Taco Bell (8.70%), Burger King (8.70%), and Texas Roadhouse (8.70%). This indicates that Noble Roman's customers also frequent these establishments.
Traffic workload reveals peak hours. Understanding workload helps optimize staffing, manage resources efficiently, and reduce wait times, increasing customer satisfaction.
Noble Roman's experiences peak traffic between 11 AM and 7 PM, with the highest workload around 12 PM (54.66). Traffic is lowest in the early morning hours (1-4 AM). This allows for optimized staffing and resource allocation.
Segment analysis tailors marketing. Understanding consumer demographics maximizes engagement, optimizes messaging, and ensures marketing efforts resonate with key audiences.
Noble Roman's consumer base shows higher affinity among men (100) compared to the average. Women are under-indexed at 99. Gen X (145) shows a high affinity, while Gen Y (75) is under-indexed, revealing segment engagement differences.