Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Nature's Table is in the top 3% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Nature's Table performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Nature's Table performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Nature's Table' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Nature's Table' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance percentile shows brand’s share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference.
Nature's Table's market performance is at the 97th percentile, indicating a leading position. This means Nature's Table captures significantly more customer traffic compared to most Cafe & Restaurants brands. Performance peers in similar range: Jass Kitchen Miami, Slice ‘n Spice Pizza & More, Downtown Tacos, Dot Coffee Shop, Radegast Hall & Biergarten, Chicago Pizza & Sports Grille.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects how happy customers are with a brand, impacting loyalty and repeat business.
Nature's Table's overall CSAT is 62%, a 3 percentage point increase year-over-year. CSAT in Florida is 70%, up 11 percentage points, while in Georgia it is 51%, down 7.8 percentage points. This suggests a strong customer experience in Florida, but declining satisfaction in Georgia.
Average check reveals how much customers spend per transaction, indicating pricing power and value perception.
The overall average check for Nature's Table is $17.30, a 16.2% increase year-over-year. In Florida, the average check is $17.70. The increase in average check indicates that customers are spending more per visit, potentially due to increased prices, upselling, or changes in order composition.
Number of outlets indicates brand reach and accessibility, impacting market penetration and convenience for customers.
Nature's Table has 32 outlets in Florida, 2 in Indiana, and 1 each in Georgia and Alabama. The concentration of outlets in Florida highlights the brand's strong presence in that state, while other states have a limited footprint.
Understanding competitors reveals market dynamics and informs strategies to differentiate and attract customers.
Nature's Table's top competitors by cross-visitation are Taco Bell and Wendy's (7.69%), followed by The Stubborn Mule, Wings Etc., and Tijuana Flats (5.13%). This indicates that Nature's Table customers also frequent these fast-food and casual dining restaurants.
Traffic workload by hours reveals peak times, helping optimize staffing and resource allocation for better service.
Nature's Table experiences peak traffic between 12 PM and 2 PM, with a high workload starting at 10 AM. There's also notable traffic at 8 AM and 9 AM. The lowest workload occurs between 2 AM and 4 AM.
Analyzing consumer segments informs targeted marketing and positioning strategies, maximizing engagement and ROI.
Nature's Table's customer base shows equal representation of Women and Men. Gen Z is over-indexed (affinity 149), while Gen X (90) and Gen Y (72) are under-indexed. This suggests Gen Z has a higher affinity for the brand compared to other generations.