Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Mouko Tanmen Nakamoto is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Mouko Tanmen Nakamoto performance in the Japan and how they change over time
See what factors influence Mouko Tanmen Nakamoto performance in the Japan and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Mouko Tanmen Nakamoto' competitors in the Japan
An analysis of Mouko Tanmen Nakamoto' competitors in the Japan
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance reveals a brand’s share of foot traffic, showing its competitive strength and customer preference in the cafe & restaurant industry.
Mouko Tanmen Nakamoto's MARKET PERFORMANCE is at the 99th percentile, making it a leading brand. This shows strong competitive positioning. Performance peers include Wagyu Sukiyaki Kyoto Chikarayama Kyoto Station Front Store, Lotteria, Hyoki, 551 Horai, Kome, Fuji Soba.
Customer satisfaction is crucial as it reflects brand loyalty and impacts future growth. Tracking CSAT helps identify areas for service and product improvement.
Overall customer satisfaction for Mouko Tanmen Nakamoto is 69%, a decrease of 1.8 percentage points year-over-year. Yamanashi Prefecture shows the highest CSAT at 79% with a 9.5pp increase, while Kanagawa Prefecture shows the lowest with 62% and a decrease of -12.9pp.
Average check indicates how much customers spend per visit, impacting revenue. Monitoring helps optimize pricing and identify upselling opportunities.
The overall average check for Mouko Tanmen Nakamoto is 1.2K JPY, a 20.9% increase year-over-year. Chiba Prefecture has an average check of 1.2K JPY, while Saitama Prefecture has an average check of 1.1K JPY.
Outlet count reflects market presence and expansion. It shows brand reach and customer accessibility across different locations and regions.
Mouko Tanmen Nakamoto has 5 outlets in Saitama Prefecture, 4 in Chiba Prefecture, 4 in Kanagawa Prefecture, and 1 in Gunma Prefecture. The distribution of outlets shows regional focus and expansion strategy.
Competitor analysis is essential for strategic positioning. It helps identify key rivals, understand competitive dynamics, and improve market strategies.
The top competitors for Mouko Tanmen Nakamoto, based on customer cross-visitation, are 店 (7.21%), Starbucks (6.28%), McDonald's (5.91%), Matsuya (4.62%), and Saizeriya (4.62%). This shows customer preference overlaps.
Understanding traffic patterns helps optimize staffing and resource allocation. Analyzing peak hours ensures efficient service and better customer experience.
Mouko Tanmen Nakamoto experiences peak traffic between 11 AM and 10 PM, with the highest workload around 12 PM (66.62%). There is almost no traffic between 12 AM and 8 AM.
Understanding consumer segments allows for tailored marketing strategies. Gender and generation insights inform messaging, channel selection, and product development.
Women are overrepresented with an affinity index of 84, compared to men at 109. Gen X exhibits high affinity (130), while Gen Y is near average (99), and Gen Z is underrepresented (37).