Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Starbucks is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Starbucks performance in the Japan and how they change over time
See what factors influence Starbucks performance in the Japan and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Starbucks' competitors in the Japan
An analysis of Starbucks' competitors in the Japan
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance percentile reflects brand's share of foot traffic, showing competitive strength and customer preference.
Starbucks in Japan holds a leading market performance at the 99th percentile. This position indicates a strong competitive presence, signaling high customer preference relative to peers like GYUKATSU KYOTO KATSUGYU, 店, McDonald's, Sukiya, Kushikatsu Tanaka, and Gyukatsu Motomura who are also in the top percentile.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects brand perception and loyalty, influencing repurchase rates and positive word-of-mouth.
Starbucks in Japan demonstrates a 70% customer satisfaction, with a 1.1 percentage point increase year-over-year. Miyazaki Prefecture shows the highest CSAT at 87%, while Kumamoto Prefecture experienced a decrease. The CSAT dynamic data indicates fluctuations over the observed months, peaking in April 2025.
Average check reveals customer spending habits and pricing power, directly impacting revenue per transaction.
The average check for Starbucks in Japan is 1K JPY, a 31.2% increase year-over-year. Nagasaki Prefecture leads with 2.2K JPY. Dynamic data shows a gradual decrease in average check from April to June 2025, from 1079.02 JPY to 975.05 JPY.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and market penetration, showing accessibility and potential customer base.
Starbucks in Japan has the highest number of outlets in Osaka Prefecture (145), followed by Aichi Prefecture (143). These figures illustrate the geographic distribution of Starbucks locations across Japan, highlighting key areas of operation.
Identifying competitors helps understand market dynamics and competitive landscape, informing strategies for differentiation.
The top competitors for Starbucks in Japan, based on cross-visitation, are McDonald's (12.97%), 店 (6.77%), Komeda's Coffee (5.60%), Sukiya (4.54%), and Doutor (4.40%). This data indicates brands whose customers also frequent Starbucks, providing insights into consumer preferences and competitive overlaps.
Traffic workload by hour reveals peak times and staffing needs, optimizing resource allocation and customer service.
Starbucks in Japan experiences peak traffic between 11 AM and 2 PM, with the highest workload at 2 PM (61.78%). Traffic is minimal in the early morning hours (12 AM - 6 AM). This data is vital for optimizing staffing and resource allocation based on customer traffic patterns.
Understanding consumer segments allows for tailored marketing, improving engagement and brand relevance.
Starbucks in Japan shows a high affinity with women (92), over indexing in men (105). Gen X are also over-indexed (117), while Gen Y (94) and Gen Z (79) are under-indexed. This data suggests that marketing strategies may need to be adapted to better engage Gen Y and Gen Z.