Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
moonbowls is in the top 2% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence moonbowls performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence moonbowls performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of moonbowls' competitors in the United States
An analysis of moonbowls' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance reveals brand strength relative to competitors, influencing investment and strategic decisions.
moonbowls' market performance is at the 98th percentile, indicating a leading position. This suggests a strong customer preference and competitive edge within the Cafe & Restaurants industry in the United States. Performance peers in the same percentile range include 1928 Cuban Bistro, Claypot Coffee House, Blue Gate, PIER 22, Creatures Coffee & Tea Co., and Alton's Restaurant.
Customer satisfaction impacts loyalty and revenue, requiring constant monitoring and improvement strategies.
Overall customer satisfaction for moonbowls is 78%, a decrease of 8.4 percentage points year-over-year. Colorado shows the highest satisfaction (100%) with an increase of 10.3pp. Other states show decreasing customer satisfaction: Ohio (83%), Georgia (82%), Texas (77%), and California (73%). The recent trend in CSAT varies between 73.68% and 81.01%.
Average check indicates spending habits and influences profitability, guiding pricing and menu optimization.
The overall average check for moonbowls is $19.60, down 2.2% year-over-year. Texas has an average check of $18.60, while California's average check is $18.30. The average check has fluctuated between $18.64 and $22.86 in recent months, suggesting some volatility in customer spending.
Outlet count indicates market reach and growth potential, impacting brand visibility and accessibility.
moonbowls has 12 outlets in California, 2 each in Texas and Illinois, and 1 each in New York, Ohio, Colorado, Georgia, and Pennsylvania. California has the most outlets, indicating a strong presence in that state.
Competitive analysis reveals market dynamics, guiding strategic positioning and differentiation efforts.
The top competitors for moonbowls, based on cross-visitation, are Starbucks (6.52%), Waffle House (4.35%), Din Tai Fung (4.35%), McDonald's (4.35%), and Main Event (4.35%). This indicates that moonbowls' customers also frequent these brands, highlighting potential areas for competitive differentiation.
Traffic workload analysis optimizes staffing and resource allocation, enhancing operational efficiency.
Traffic workload for moonbowls varies throughout the day, with peak activity between 10 AM and 10 PM. The highest traffic workload occurs at 9 PM (50.75%), while minimal activity is observed between midnight and 9 AM. Resource allocation should align with these peak hours.
Segment analysis allows targeted marketing by identifying key consumer demographics and behaviors.
moonbowls' customer base consists of 99% women and 101% men. Gen X is represented by 41%, Gen Y by 149%, and Gen Z by 91%. Gen Y shows high affinity.