Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Laughing Planet is in the top 3% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Laughing Planet performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Laughing Planet performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Laughing Planet' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Laughing Planet' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance shows brand's share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Laughing Planet's market performance is in the top 3% (97th percentile), indicating a leading position in the Cafe & Restaurants industry in the United States. This signifies strong brand preference. Performance peers include Umami ramen house, Panorama Room, The Waterfront Restaurant, KAI Japanese Restaurant, B&K Tea Cafe, and Michoacana Pedir De Boca, all at the same percentile.
Customer satisfaction is crucial as it directly impacts loyalty, brand reputation, and overall business success in the competitive cafe industry.
Laughing Planet's overall customer satisfaction is 66%, down by 11.6 percentage points year-over-year. Oregon shows 71% satisfaction, down 5.3 percentage points, while Nevada has 68%, down 16.7 percentage points. The CSAT dynamic data shows fluctuations from April to June 2025, with significant volatility indicating inconsistent customer experiences.
Average check reveals customer spending habits and contributes significantly to revenue optimization and profitability analysis.
Laughing Planet's overall average check is $17.50, a decrease of 1.4% year-over-year. Nevada's average check is $18.80, with no growth, while Oregon's is $16.50, also with no growth. Average check dynamic data shows variability from April to June 2025, impacting revenue forecasting.
Outlet numbers indicate brand reach and market penetration, influencing accessibility and overall revenue potential.
Laughing Planet has 11 outlets in Oregon, 2 in Nevada, and 1 in Washington. The majority of outlets are concentrated in Oregon, indicating a strong regional presence there. Nevada and Washington represent smaller, potentially newer, markets for the brand.
Competitor analysis reveals brand positioning and helps identify opportunities for differentiation and strategic advantage.
Laughing Planet's top competitors based on cross-visitation are Starbucks (10.77%), Chipotle Mexican Grill (6.15%), Taco Bell (4.62%), Provence Boulangerie & Patisserie (4.62%), and McDonald's (4.62%). This indicates that Laughing Planet's customers also frequent these establishments.
Traffic workload by hour reveals peak times, enabling optimized staffing, resource allocation, and service efficiency.
Laughing Planet experiences peak traffic workload between 12:00 PM and 6:00 PM, with the highest workload around 1:00 PM (65.80). There is minimal traffic between 0:00 AM and 9:00 AM and after 8:00 PM. This workload data will help to improve resource allocation.
Understanding consumer segments enables targeted marketing, product development, and personalized customer experiences, improving engagement.
Women are overrepresented (Affinity Index 103) and men are slightly underrepresented (Affinity Index 98). Gen Z is highly overrepresented (Affinity Index 148), Gen Y shows near-average affinity (Affinity Index 97) and Gen X is underrepresented (Affinity Index 72).