Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Juicy is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Juicy performance in the India and how they change over time
See what factors influence Juicy performance in the India and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Juicy' competitors in the India
An analysis of Juicy' competitors in the India
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance percentile shows brand's foot traffic share, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Juicy, with a market performance percentile of 99, is a leading brand. This indicates high customer preference and a strong competitive position in the Cafe & Restaurants industry in India. Its peers Sai Sogadu, Cheelgadi, Thanjavur Kitchen, Chai kings, DONJON and Dumont Creamery share same percentile range.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects customer happiness, directly impacting loyalty and brand perception, influencing repeat business and positive reviews.
Juicy's overall CSAT is 77%, a 3.2 percentage point increase year-over-year, signaling improved customer satisfaction. Kerala shows a CSAT of 74% with a growth of 0.8 percentage points. The dynamic CSAT data shows fluctuations over the observed period, peaking in June 2025.
Average check reveals how much customers spend per visit, impacting revenue. Monitoring this KPI helps optimize pricing and menu strategies.
Juicy's overall average check is 255.8 INR, a 20% increase year-over-year, indicating customers are spending more per visit. Tamil Nadu shows the highest average check at 320.8 INR. The average check fluctuated between April and June 2025, with a high of 281.52 INR in April.
Outlet count indicates market presence and expansion. Tracking this metric helps assess brand reach and identify growth opportunities across regions.
Juicy has 21 outlets. Kerala has the most with 19 outlets, while Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh each have 1. This suggests a strong presence in Kerala, with opportunities for expansion in other states.
Competitor analysis helps identify key players and their market share, informing competitive strategies and highlighting areas for differentiation.
Juicy's top competitors based on customer cross-visitation are KFC (6.81%), Chicking (3.94%), Indian Coffee House (3.23%), Saravana Bhavan (2.87%), and KR Bakes (2.87%). This indicates that customers who visit Juicy also frequent these fast-food and coffee chains.
Understanding traffic workload by hour helps optimize staffing and resource allocation, improving service efficiency and customer experience.
Juicy experiences peak traffic between 17:00 and 21:00, with the highest workload around 20:00 (75.26). Traffic is minimal between 0:00 and 9:00. This information can be used to optimize staffing and resource allocation during peak hours.
Consumer segment analysis informs targeted marketing by revealing demographic preferences, allowing for personalized campaigns and improved engagement.
Juicy's customer base shows a high affinity for women (104%) and Gen Z (115%), suggesting these segments are overrepresented among its customers. Gen X affinity is 102%, while Gen Y is under-indexed at 99%. Marketing may consider specific interest for women and Gen Z.