Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
GARUDA is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence GARUDA performance in the Indonesia and how they change over time
See what factors influence GARUDA performance in the Indonesia and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of GARUDA' competitors in the Indonesia
An analysis of GARUDA' competitors in the Indonesia
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market Performance shows brand's share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
GARUDA, with a Market Performance of 99, is a leading brand in the Cafe & Restaurants industry in Indonesia, placing it in the top 1%. This high percentile indicates a strong market presence. Performance peers include Locaāhands, Baia Nonna, Bakso Rusuk Samanhudi PIK, Morikafe, Ayam Geprek DBC, and Mixue Barito, all within the same leading percentile range.
Customer Satisfaction reflects customer loyalty, directly impacting revenue. Declines need urgent attention to pinpoint and resolve issues.
GARUDA's overall customer satisfaction (CSAT) is 62%, a decrease of 12 percentage points year-over-year. Sumatra shows a CSAT of 65% with a decrease of 14.9pp, while Java has 59%, decreasing by 10.4pp. The declining CSAT indicates potential issues needing investigation.
Average Check tracks customer spending habits, vital for revenue optimization. Declines may indicate changing customer behavior or pricing issues.
GARUDA's overall average check is 96.8K IDR, a decrease of 11.6% year-over-year. Java has an average check of 106.8K IDR with no growth, while Sumatra's is 91.8K IDR, also with no growth. This overall decline suggests potential pricing or customer spending issues.
Outlet distribution shows market reach and expansion effectiveness. Changes indicate growth, consolidation, or shifting priorities.
GARUDA has 12 outlets in Sumatra, 4 in Java, and 1 in Maluku. This distribution indicates a stronger presence in Sumatra compared to Java and Maluku, highlighting regional expansion focus.
Analyzing competitors reveals market dynamics and opportunities. Cross-visitation identifies key brands vying for the same customer base.
GARUDA's top competitors based on customer cross-visitation are KFC (9.92%), Starbucks (6.11%), Sederhana (6.11%), Richeese Factory (6.11%), and Domino's Pizza (5.34%). These brands capture GARUDA's customers, showing direct competition for the same market segment.
Traffic Workload highlights peak hours, enabling staffing and marketing optimization. Understanding customer traffic helps manage resources efficiently.
GARUDA experiences peak traffic workload between 11 AM and 7 PM, with the highest traffic around 6 PM (67.29). The lowest traffic occurs between 3 AM and 6 AM. This data enables staffing and marketing to align with customer visit patterns.
Understanding consumer segments tailors marketing, improving engagement. Gender and generation insights refine messaging and product offerings.
GARUDA's customer base has a high affinity index for Women (69), which is under-indexed, and Men (125), which is over-indexed. Regarding generations, Gen X (146) and Gen Y (106) are over-indexed, while Gen Z (78) is under-indexed. These insights can inform targeted marketing.