Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Crazy Bowls & Wraps is in the top 2% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Crazy Bowls & Wraps performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Crazy Bowls & Wraps performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Crazy Bowls & Wraps' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Crazy Bowls & Wraps' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
MARKET PERFORMANCE percentile shows brand’s share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference.
Crazy Bowls & Wraps, with a market performance percentile of 98, holds a leading position. This indicates strong customer preference compared to competitors like Honolulu Noodle & Co., Malbec Grill, yum! Kitchen and Bakery, Chicha San Chen 吃茶三千, L'Antica Pizzeria da Michele, and Town Topic Hamburgers, which share a similar percentile.
Customer Satisfaction (CSAT) reflects customer loyalty and the quality of experiences, impacting retention and brand reputation.
Crazy Bowls & Wraps demonstrates strong customer satisfaction, with an overall CSAT of 76%, a 9.6 percentage point increase year-over-year. Missouri shows a CSAT of 78% with a 6.7 percentage point increase, while Illinois has a 68% CSAT with a 32.5 percentage point increase. The CSAT trend between April and June 2025 varied, peaking in June.
Average Check reveals customer spending habits and pricing effectiveness, crucial for revenue management and profitability analysis.
The overall average check for Crazy Bowls & Wraps is $16.50, down 11% year-over-year. Missouri's average check is $16.70 with no change. The average check fluctuated between April and June 2025. Declining trend indicates change in customer spending habits.
Number of Outlets indicates brand's market presence and expansion strategy, influencing accessibility and market share.
Crazy Bowls & Wraps has 14 outlets in Missouri and 2 in Illinois. Missouri accounts for most of the brand's presence. This data shows a geographic distribution of Crazy Bowls & Wraps locations.
Identifying competitors reveals direct alternatives for customers, guiding competitive strategies and differentiation efforts.
McDonald's is the most cross-visited brand (18.33%) by Crazy Bowls & Wraps customers, followed by Panera Bread (11.67%), Dairy Queen (8.33%), Jack in the Box (6.67%), and First Watch (6.67%). This indicates these brands attract similar customer segments.
Traffic Workload by hours helps optimize staffing and resource allocation based on peak and off-peak demand patterns.
Traffic workload peaks between 11 AM and 7 PM, reaching its highest at 12 PM (73.7%). There is no traffic between 9 PM and 7 AM. Data shows when the brand is the busiest.
Understanding consumer segments enables targeted marketing, tailoring products and messaging to specific demographic groups.
Women show a slight under-index (94) and Men show a slight over-index (105) for Crazy Bowls & Wraps. Gen Y (117) is over-indexed, indicating high affinity. Gen X (68) and Gen Z (64) are under-indexed.