Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Chi'Lantro is in the top 2% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Chi'Lantro performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Chi'Lantro performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Chi'Lantro' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Chi'Lantro' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance percentile indicates brand's share of foot traffic, showing its competitive strength and customer preference.
Chi'Lantro has a market performance of 98, which places it in the leading position. This means Chi'Lantro captures a significant share of customer traffic compared to its peers. Performance peers in a similar range include: Waffle and Berry, Taj Mahal Bar & Grill, Bluefin Sushi & Ramen, Ferrara Bakery & Cafe, Taqueria Mexico, and Someburger, all with a score of 98.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects brand perception and loyalty, impacting retention and long-term growth.
Chi'Lantro's overall customer satisfaction is at 89%, with a 7.8 percentage point increase year-over-year, showing improvement. In Texas, customer satisfaction is also at 89% reflecting positive customer sentiment in this location. Dynamic data indicates CSAT fluctuated slightly between April (87.77%) and June (89.13%) of 2025.
Average check is a key revenue indicator, reflecting customer spending and pricing strategy effectiveness.
Chi'Lantro's overall average check is $18.20, up 8.7% year-over-year, showing increased customer spending. In Texas, the average check is $18.20, reflecting consistent spending across locations. Dynamic data indicates the average check varied from $20.20 in April to $17.39 in June 2025.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and expansion, reflecting growth strategy and market penetration.
Chi'Lantro has 13 outlets in Texas. This number indicates their physical presence and market coverage within the state. There is no growth data provided, so no inferences can be made about the change in number of outlets.
Identifying competitors helps refine strategies by understanding customer choices and market dynamics.
The top competitors for Chi'Lantro based on cross-visitation are McDonald's (10.26%), Chick-fil-A (6.41%), Kerbey Lane Cafe (5.13%), Whataburger (3.85%), and Velvet Taco (3.85%). This shows customers who visit Chi'Lantro also frequent these establishments.
Analyzing traffic workload reveals peak hours, aiding staffing and resource allocation for optimal service.
Chi'Lantro experiences peak traffic between 10:00 AM and 9:00 PM, with the highest workload around 6:00 PM to 7:00 PM (64.58% to 64.77%). Traffic is minimal during early morning hours (0:00 AM to 9:00 AM, and after 10:00 PM). This indicates peak dining hours are in the afternoon and early evening.
Understanding consumer segments enables tailored marketing, optimizing engagement and brand resonance.
Chi'Lantro's consumer base shows a higher affinity among women (73%), men (123%), Gen X (91%), Gen Y (120%), and Gen Z (109%). The high index for men and Gen Y suggests they are strongly represented. The affinity index is underrepresented among women and Gen X. This means relative to average, women are underrepresented and men are overrepresented, and Gen X underrepresnted while GenY and GenZ are overrepresented.