Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Café Zupas is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Café Zupas performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Café Zupas performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Café Zupas' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Café Zupas' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance reflects brand's share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Café Zupas, with a market performance percentile of 99, is a leading brand. This indicates a strong competitive position, suggesting high customer preference. Its performance peers, all at the 99th percentile, are Amorino Gelato, Daiquiri Island Togo, HG Sply Co., Sickies Garage Burgers & Brews, Beans & Brews Coffeehouse and Tupelo Honey Southern Kitchen & Bar, meaning they share comparable customer volume.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) measures how happy customers are with their experiences, influencing loyalty and brand reputation.
Café Zupas' overall CSAT is 65%, a decrease of 12.9 percentage points year-over-year. Ohio shows the highest CSAT at 89% with 1.8pp growth, while Utah has the lowest at 65% with a -13.8pp decrease. These insights highlight areas needing customer experience improvements.
Average check reflects how much customers spend per visit, indicating pricing strategy effectiveness and customer spending habits.
Café Zupas' overall average check is $18.8, a 6.8% increase year-over-year. Illinois and Nevada lead with $20.2, while Utah's average check is $19.1. These figures show customer spending habits and regional revenue differences.
Number of outlets indicates brand's market presence and expansion, reflecting growth strategy and market coverage.
Café Zupas has 30 outlets in Utah, the most of any state. Arizona follows with 13 outlets, and then Minnesota with 11. The number of outlets is the main factor of brand presence in the selected state.
Competitor analysis reveals brands competing for the same customers, informing strategies to differentiate and capture market share.
The top competitors for Café Zupas are McDonald's (9.63%), Chick-fil-A (6.54%), Starbucks (6.18%), In-N-Out Burger (5.59%), and Culver's (4.64%). These brands attract a significant portion of Café Zupas' customer base.
Traffic workload analysis identifies peak hours, enabling efficient staffing and resource allocation to meet customer demand.
Café Zupas experiences peak traffic workload between 12:00 PM (66.34) and 6:00 PM (54.70), with the highest traffic at 12:00 PM. Understanding these patterns allows for optimized operational planning.
Understanding consumer segments enables targeted marketing, tailoring strategies to resonate with specific demographic groups.
Women show a high affinity (110 index) for Café Zupas, while Men are under-indexed (92 index). Gen X (107 index) and Gen Z (107 index) exhibit high affinity, whereas Gen Y is slightly under-indexed (95 index).