Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
Taranovas Pizza is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Taranovas Pizza performance in the India and how they change over time
See what factors influence Taranovas Pizza performance in the India and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
An analysis of Taranovas Pizza' competitors in the India
An analysis of Taranovas Pizza' competitors in the India
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance indicates brand's share of foot traffic, revealing competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Taranovas Pizza is a leading brand with a market performance percentile of 99, placing it in the top 1%. This indicates a strong market presence and high customer preference compared to competitors like Kamal Pure Vegetarian, Madurai Mannar Mess, The Food Planet, HOTEL SANDEEP, Chef’s Family Restaurant and Larilappa cafe, and The bbro poolside cafe & restaurant, all positioned at the 99th percentile.
Customer satisfaction is crucial for brand loyalty and repeat business, reflecting the quality of products and services.
Taranovas Pizza shows an overall customer satisfaction (CSAT) of 86%, a decrease of 3.2 percentage points year-over-year. CSAT is 92% in Madhya Pradesh (down by 3.5 percentage points) and 85% in Gujarat (down by 2.9 percentage points). While the CSAT is high, the downward trend suggests a need to investigate and address potential issues affecting customer experience in both states to improve it.
Average check reflects customer spending per visit and helps understand revenue trends and pricing effectiveness.
The overall average check for Taranovas Pizza is 559.2 INR, showing a 3.1% decrease year-over-year. Gujarat has an average check of 568.6 INR, while Madhya Pradesh has 439.1 INR. The decrease in average check suggests a need to analyze menu pricing, promotions, and customer spending habits to optimize revenue.
Outlet count indicates brand's physical presence, influencing market reach and accessibility to customers.
Taranovas Pizza has 25 outlets in Gujarat and 2 outlets in Madhya Pradesh. This distribution indicates a stronger presence in Gujarat compared to Madhya Pradesh, suggesting potential for expansion or increased market penetration efforts in Madhya Pradesh.
Identifying top competitors is vital for strategic benchmarking and understanding competitive landscape.
The top competitors for Taranovas Pizza, based on customer cross-visitation, are McDonald's (9.25%), La Pino'z Pizza (9.25%), Domino's Pizza (3.96%), Tea Post (3.96%), and La Milano Pizzeria (2.20%). This indicates a significant overlap in customer base with McDonald's and La Pino'z Pizza, suggesting they are primary competitors for customer share.
Traffic workload analysis helps optimize staffing and resource allocation based on peak hours.
Traffic workload for Taranovas Pizza peaks between 18:00 and 22:00, with the highest traffic at 21:00 (54.13%). There is very low traffic volume between 0:00 and 10:00. This data suggests the need for optimized staffing during evening hours and marketing efforts to increase traffic during off-peak times.
Understanding consumer demographics allows tailored marketing strategies for better engagement.
Women are overrepresented (80% affinity) among Taranovas Pizza's consumers, while men are more than fully represented (107% affinity). Gen X (104% affinity) and Gen Y (103% affinity) show higher affinity, while Gen Z (89% affinity) is underrepresented. This information is useful for tailored marketing.