Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
See what factors influence Sharks Fish & Chicken performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Sharks Fish & Chicken performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
Search among the top brands by number of locations
An analysis of Sharks Fish & Chicken' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Sharks Fish & Chicken' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
Sharks Fish & Chicken is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance reveals brand's share of foot traffic, reflecting its competitive strength and customer preference within the Cafe & Restaurants industry.
Sharks Fish & Chicken is a leading brand with a market performance percentile of 99, placing it in the top 1%. This indicates a strong market position relative to its peers. Performance peers in a similar range include Fan Szechuan Restaurant & Bar 大宅门餐厅酒吧, 홍반장, Vintage Books, Sugar - Sweets & Gelato, Karl Strauss Brewing Company, and Halal Cart University.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) indicates brand perception, loyalty, and potential for growth. High CSAT typically correlates with repeat business and positive word-of-mouth.
The overall CSAT for Sharks Fish & Chicken is 60%, a 1.1pp increase year-over-year. Illinois shows a CSAT of 60% with 1.2pp growth, while Indiana has 55% CSAT with a decline of 2.8pp. There was CSAT fluctuation during the period from 61.36% in May to 68% in June then decreasing to 50.46% in July.
Average check reflects customer spending per visit, indicating pricing strategy effectiveness and customer willingness to spend at Sharks Fish & Chicken.
The overall average check is $23.6, a 6.6% increase year-over-year. In Illinois, the average check is $24.1 USD, showing no growth. The average check fluctuated from $21.22 in May to $29.14 in June, and then decreased to $21.35 in July.
The number of outlets reflects brand reach and expansion. Growth indicates investment, while distribution shows market penetration and accessibility.
Sharks Fish & Chicken has 22 outlets in Illinois and 3 in Indiana. Illinois accounts for the majority of the brand's presence. The outlets in Indiana only account for 13.64% relative to Illinois.
Analyzing competitors reveals market dynamics and customer preferences. Cross-visitation highlights shared customer base and competitive overlap in the Cafe & Restaurants sector.
McDonald's (19.2%) has the highest cross-visitation with Sharks Fish & Chicken customers, followed by Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen (12%), Dunkin' (11.2%), Little Caesars Pizza (9.6%), and Burger King (8.8%). This indicates these brands are frequently visited by Sharks Fish & Chicken customers.
Understanding traffic workload by hour optimizes staffing, resource allocation, and marketing efforts to match peak demand and improve customer experience.
Traffic workload for Sharks Fish & Chicken peaks between 4 PM and 6 PM (hod 16-18), with the highest traffic workload at 6 PM (63.03). Low traffic workload is observed between 1 AM and 9 AM (hod 1-9). The peak in the afternoon suggests a strong dinner crowd.
Analyzing consumer segments by Gender and Generation informs targeted marketing, positioning strategies, and deeper understanding of customer preferences.
Women (89 affinity index) are slightly under-indexed compared to Men (110 affinity index). Gen X (123 affinity index) are over-indexed, Gen Y (107 affinity index) are slightly over-indexed and Gen Z (74 affinity index) are under-indexed relative to the average consumer. This suggests that Sharks Fish & Chicken is strongly preferred by Gen X.