Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
See what factors influence Sabi Sushi performance in the Norway and how they change over time
See what factors influence Sabi Sushi performance in the Norway and how they change over time
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
An analysis of Sabi Sushi' competitors in the Norway
An analysis of Sabi Sushi' competitors in the Norway
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
Sabi Sushi is right in the middle
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance shows brand's share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Sabi Sushi's market performance is average/above average with a percentile of 48. This indicates a moderate market presence. Performance peers in the same range include Fish Me, Fjellskål Seafood Restaurant, Starbucks, Jamal’s falafel, Ægir microbrewery, and Pingvinen.
Customer satisfaction reflects brand perception and loyalty, directly impacting retention and revenue growth. It highlights areas for service improvement.
Overall customer satisfaction for Sabi Sushi is 75%, a decrease of 6.6 percentage points year-over-year. Vestland shows high satisfaction (91%), while Rogaland has 74% satisfaction. Satisfaction peaked in July 2025 at 79.52%.
Average check indicates customer spending per visit, crucial for revenue optimization and understanding pricing effectiveness and customer value.
The average check for Sabi Sushi varies by location. Rogaland has an average check of 510.60 NOK, while Vestland's is 297.40 NOK. The average check peaked in June 2025 at 469.57 NOK.
Outlet count reflects market reach and expansion, influencing brand visibility and accessibility to customers across different regions.
Sabi Sushi has a total of 33 outlets. Rogaland has the highest number of outlets (15), followed by Akershus (4), Trøndelag (3), and Vestland (3). Other counties have fewer outlets.
Competitor analysis identifies key rivals and customer preferences, informing competitive strategies and highlighting opportunities for differentiation.
Sabi Sushi's top competitors based on cross-visitation are McDonald's (11.11%), Burger King (6.94%), Fisketorget Stavanger (5.56%), Pizzabakeren (5.56%), and Peppes Pizza (4.17%).
Traffic workload analysis optimizes staffing and resource allocation, ensuring efficient service during peak hours and improving customer experience.
Sabi Sushi experiences peak traffic workload between 14:00 and 18:00, with the highest workload at 17:00 (60.84%). Traffic is minimal before 10:00 and after 21:00.
Understanding consumer segments enables targeted marketing, tailoring products and messaging to specific demographics for increased engagement and conversion rates.
Sabi Sushi's customer base shows a higher affinity among women (index 121) and Gen Z (index 194), indicating these segments are overrepresented. Gen X (index 77) and Gen Y (index 87) are underrepresented.